Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Agave Silver Corp. CRMXF



GREY:CRMXF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by robey743on Aug 19, 2012 1:25pm
195 Views
Post# 20235189

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Endeavor

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Endeavor

Curvature

Frank Lang and Ferdinand Holcapek gave CMA investors a compliant NI 43-101 in January 2006. A revised NI 43-101, was released December 2008 which was based on the first NI 43-101, (January 2006). Ferdinand Holcapek was the "Qualified Person" for both NI 43-101 Reports. Frank Lang was the CMA CEO when the first NI 43-101 was compiled and released and was the CEO, (at the very least) when the above mentioned 'revised' NI 43-101 was initiated and compiled. Both NI 43 101 Reports were accepted by the industry and by investors, primarily due to one detail. Both individuals mentioned have degrees that enable them to speak with authority - Frank Lang P. Eng., Ferdinand Holcapek P. Eng.

History, (mentioned above) and results do not, did not match. Regardless of the failure of resources not matching the “Qualified Person” interpretations, we are still left with the one, ultimate reason for investing and that is, accepting what we are given by a “Qualified Person” as just cause for investing in a project.

Now, addressing today, addressing you and your claims, I note the absence of a qualifier; Curvature "I'm the Greatest' does not compel me to accept each and every word you utter and/or post. I would also point out that your 'hindsight observations' and your evolving story, (of what you told investors) has little or no value when addressing the here and now.

Your usual, "You are an idiot and I'm not," obviously does not work for you. Try a different approach, one that involves a level playing field for all - Using the term 'level playing field' does not mean you should post more stories about football fields and beer bottles.

You saving me from myself? My advice to you is, resolve your own problems before attempting to help anyone else.

Bullboard Posts