RE: RE: RE: No Cash = DILUTION “The market expected better results and did not get them. As a result the share price is reflecting what the market thinks of them.”
By your own words, you define the ‘market’ as, “Investors that failed to see, (or take the time to find out) what they were invested in. This same group, evidently, did not know the value of the actual reported resources and the value per share those resources represented.” – By refusing to allow facts to be part of the thought process we can concentrate on what we want the outcome to be, or what we think it should be, not on what it is; IMO this is what the ‘market’ reacted to and you are suggesting we all follow this line of reasoning.
“Booking a tax loss is an investment strategy.”
This has been discussed in the past and while it is a method of recouping a small portion of losses it is not the preferred action an investor wishes to take.
“Bottom line, they need cash and the stock is getting diluted. Dilution is a stock killer.”
There is a great deal of difference in needing $800,000 or $3,800,000 to advance the project. Your dismissal of the difference goes hand in hand with your refusal to acknowledge the current value of the resources that are there.
I believe you are asking investors to assume the following position:
https://media.photobucket.com/image/head%20up%20rear/Bekkiehere/Funnies/head-in-butt_thumb1.jpg?o=3
No thank you.