GREY:CUDBF - Post by User
Comment by
Jsbachfanon Aug 07, 2014 8:49pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0340-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
257 Views
Post# 22820428
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:45 X 75 = 3,375bopd
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:45 X 75 = 3,375bopd". Perhaps is you truly are a trial lawyer by trade as you say, then maybe lose bottom of the heap over the glasses mentality/tone..."
Something seems to have gone awry with your ability to write coherently, judging from the above.Nonetheless the gist of it appears to question the veracity of what I have said was my FORMER profession. I am surprised given my obvious bent towards requesting EVIDENTIARY corroboration for some of the ostensibly misleading statements that emanate from some posters.
Given that a) not one analyst covers POP so far as I can see ,b) it has a history of overpromising and underdelivering c) the Koreans have ONLY committed $18 mill (small change to them) so far d) I am given to understand from knowledgable sources that an aroma still surrounds POP arisng from the Chapman era, I would be surprised if "institutions" are piling into this in desperation of being left out, as longshortman and his friends are implying. Despite what he says it is possible to ascertain if Dundee, Sprott etc have holdings.
Just mark me down as being a sort of Anderson Cooper, i.e keeping them honest, as well as being a substantial shareholder who is delighted at the recent turn of events as they bring me closer to reaching profitabilty.
Thats all