Trump Media & Technology Group Corp DJT

'Very hard' on wife Melania

[Nailbiter2]

Donald Trump says hush-money trial 'very hard' on wife Melania

Donald Trump has said his historic trial and criminal conviction have been "very hard" for his wife, former First Lady Melania Trump.

In an interview with Fox News over the weekend, Mr Trump vowed that success at the upcoming November US election would be his "revenge".

The details included Mr Trump greeting her in silk pyjamas at his hotel suite, and Ms Daniels' claims that he did not wear protection when they allegedly had sex.

"She's fine, but I think it's very hard for her," Mr Trump said of his wife, adding that "in many ways, it's tougher on them [his family] than it is me".
"As I reflect on this whole situation", said the former president,
"I guess I should have just kept my toadstool in my pants".

[dart321]

LOL so he just admitted the Jury that found him guilty of 34 criminal charges where right and he lied about everything. As if the rest of the world didn't know this guy lies all the time. Did his wife show up at the trial, no not a single time, ya think she cares?

[Moemoney42]

Exactly what I thought when I read the post dart.. LMAO..!!

[KozmoT]

Pretty sure that was a bogus quote. The giveaway was when Trump allegedly said, "As I reflect on this whole situation..."  Do you really thinkTrump is capable of such a thing. Heck I doubt he is capable of even uttering such a thing.  LOL

[dart321]

You could be right or he may be trying to play the judge by showing some remorse before the sentencing starts. He broke 10 gag orders he trashed the judge and his family, he trashed the state and he thinks there will be no jail time! The judge has to take all thing into consideration before he sets the sentence. This clown coud get the max in some form.

[KozmoT]

I checked ... its bogus. Anyway, we can be pretty sure the only "reflecting" Trump does is standing in front of a mirror.

[VeritasVern]

Dart the institution you live in - should really limit your internet time. 

[VeritasVern]

Dart you are clueless, but keep stroking yourself if it makes you feel good. Firstly guilty of 34 criminal charges on a legal expense related to a simple NDA! How does one come up with 34 charges on a NDA? Right there that tells you they were out to get-Trump as they needed only one charge to stick. As for liars how about the Star witness Cohen he lied in court, lied to his family, the IRS and

[KozmoT]

And yet he was found unanimously guilty by a jury of his peers on all charges right in his own home town.  The jury that was selected with the participation of his own lawyers.  And Cohen's testimony was accompanied by and confirmed by Hope Hicks and Trump's buddy Pecker.  So it looks like you might just be having the same problem logjam is having ... accepting reality.

[VeritasVern]

Sure Kozimoto if it makes you feel good but you are dead wrong. The DOJ passed on this case years ago as it was a nothing burger. But DA Braggart took it on because: Fat Albert campaigned on "getting Tump" before being elected DA and knew no details of this case?Sup? How does a State DA charge someone with a supposed crime that is Federal in nature? Why did the crooked Judge not allow

[Moemoney42]

Vern Vern Vern.. ranting with "opinions" only proves NOTHING.  Why didn't the defense bring in the FEC if it was remotely relevant..? Obviously the judge had nothing to do with the "vote" and conviction.. it was a jury of 12 ordinary citizens, with morals, I might add.  "a case that is backfiring"... what world do you live in.. 34 CONVICTIONS man.. wait

[VeritasVern]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Moemoney42]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[KozmoT]

And yet he was found unanimously guilty by a jury of his peers on all charges right in his own home town.  The jury that was selected with the participation of his own lawyers.   Reality doesn't seem to be on your side there Mr. Legal Genius. ... LOL

[VeritasVern]

Sure Kozimoto if it makes you feel good but you are dead wrong. The DOJ passed on this case years ago as it was a nothing burger. But DA Braggart took it on because: Fat Albert campaigned on "getting Tump" before being elected DA and knew no details of this case?Sup? How does a State DA charge someone with a supposed crime that is Federal in nature? Why did the crooked Judge not allow

[KozmoT]

You do understand that based on all the evidence he was found guilty ... you do know that, right?

[dart321]

LOL what part of russia do you come from? NDA ( non disclosue agreement ) has nothing to do with anything it's a non inforcable doc people think they might be held to if they break it. LOL star witness was Pecker and the other trump people that told the truth They are the witnesses that hung trump they proved all the docs submitted where factual, paper doesn't lie like trump. The docs