Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Duluth Metals Ltd DULMF



GREY:DULMF - Post by User

Comment by yoda2on May 13, 2014 2:45pm
245 Views
Post# 22556752

RE:RE:RE:RE:Finally Dundas is no longer CEO.

RE:RE:RE:RE:Finally Dundas is no longer CEO.rational would you help clarify as i am confused.
from the NR it seems Osborne had been seconded to Twin Metals in 2012 and only returned to DM in March 2014.  This mean DM adds one more executive?  Then Baker goes , for one less executive  therefore seeming to keep the number of execcutives the same.
As Baker was a mining operations type it would seem Dundas was the CEO.
Dundas plans to continue working fulltime, so it is hard to imagine that whatever the titles how he would not remain the defac to CEO.
the main point seems to be that the "return' of Osborne and the departure of Baker are not likely to change much at DM and there do not appear to be any meaningful cost savings(presuming Osborne's compensation was not paid for by DM when he was seconded to Twin metals).


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>