Absolutely stellar infill !!! -Every one of my expectations, logical conclusions derived from the unassailable drill database has been borne out here exactly as I had expected !! :O)
Both lengths and grades are stellar and points clearly to a future increase in the model NSRs, and underline with two extra fat lines and in bold and italics, that it is THE SOFTWARE MODEL itself which had a deficiency due to being supplied with under-sampled inputs and NOT the actual physical geology on site. This is where many have made a mental mistake: Listening more to the models suggestions with under-sampled inputs, than to the excellent drill database which represents a much more accurate and unassailable picture of the physical reality.
Worth noting that these grades are listed only with flow-sheet supported metals, so in a way they are even higher than stated (in comparison to the pre-2023 method of listing all metals, and to the extent the flowsheet supported range of metals would be expanded in the future as is being examined).
Intercepts are long and solid, and the grades top notch - oftentimes even quite a bit better than expected. I had quite positive expectations derived from the hard data in the drill database, and they are clearly very much surpassed to the upside here.
Frankly the naysayers and my detractors must feel pretty ignorant right now, as this was entirely predictable, and indeed turned out: Entirely as predicted.