Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Orbite Technologies Inc EORBF

Orbite Technologies Inc is a Canada-based mineral-processing and resource development company. The firm is organised into the following segments; Specialty Products, Waste Monetization and Commodity Minerals. It produces alumina, silica, hematite, magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, smelter-grade alumina, rare earth oxides and rare metal oxides. The operation plant is based in Canada.


GREY:EORBF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by ProOrbiteon Mar 26, 2017 11:04pm
492 Views
Post# 26033773

Producing!

Producing!Since they are already producing 4N+ HPA as a result of purity parity from the lower quality ACH.
We can deduct that 5N+ will come as well, when they introduce the higher quality ACH.
To me thats in the bag already!

The time they have taken in my opinion since that last NEW release is not a result of failure but
of finding baselines/thresholds on where the breakdown of producing occures using the various methods they have available. You do not want to do this with the higher Quality ACH? NOT!!

With the limits defined:
You will know when the breakdown occures in producing HPA when by lowering power consumption/heat it fails to produce HPA. Base line established..

Why is this good? They will have great saving in operating cost going forward that maximese profits! Less damge and less risk to equipment breakdowns due to heat.

With the current set up, they are in my opnion pushing the HPA through put as well to determine how fast they can produce until it breaks down and affect purity parity as well.

Why is this good? There might not need of anymore cost to alter/expand current operating plant
to produce 5 tons of 5N+ HPA per day. maybe they can use current equipment.

NOW if the above senarious come true would you begrudge them that time to establish these baseline if it saved a ton of money and maximises profit with no further capitol required?

Put it another way if they just produced 5N+ HPA 4 weeks ago they would not know anything about base lines. Those base line would only be theory.

So good luck to all. May you richly be rewarded for your patience!

Bullboard Posts