RE: RE: RE: RE: Elements of a Waste of time but here goes anyway. Crabhouse and Mdrfan69
Holes 30, 34 and 36 reported no significant mineralization (this information is public
as part of a table on the newest March 2013 Presentation on Alpha's website) and true these holes
were not named in the NR released on February 25th.It doesn't take alot of brainpower or math skills
to understand that 3 of the ten holes were not reported because there was nothing there.
However the other 7 holes in this 10 hole package showed significant (5 of them) to weak (2 of them)
mineralization. The only argument one could make is that the company could have put
the chart from the presentation at the bottom of the NR. My first thought is
who cares? and my second thought is to look at their style of reporting and suffice it to say it is
diverse. Should the report of read "Step out holes on 5 of 10 show significant mineralization but OH NO! 3
are TOTAL DUDS!" Sorry couldn't resist but really if you don't like the stock or have an agenda nothing
they do will suffice and nothing others (like me) say will matter.
Some results are tabled when it is in the interests of the shareholder and the company
to do so as is the case with the NR on March 11th which collated Drill hole 38 with 44 and 46 as well as
hole 51. This showed that the 390E discovery was open to the east of PLS 38 and north but seemingly
not to the south. Pretty accurate reporting and not all "rah rah hey hey" as you have insinuated... otherwise
PLS 46 would have been left out.
PLS 42 and 44 were drilled 2.2 km away from Zone 0E and didn't show mineralization but were reported
anyway and show geological features that geologists get excited about. Great! again let them do their job
can't say I am upset with what has been done so far.
If you actually take the time and go to Fission's website as well you will notice that
https://www.fission-energy.com/s/pattersonlakesouth.asp the gamma logs include
all the holes even the ones with little or no evidence of mineralization or radioactivity. Piece
this together with the Alpha presentation and all of the NR's and the question that begs asked
of you and your pals are what holes are you talking about that are unreported.
30, 34 and 36? seriously!? that is reason for caution?
The complete map of the "proposed" 2013 drill locations is on neither website I am guessing because as
promised by the management team it has changed because of Zone 390E. Awesome! unless of course
this is another part of the conspiracy against shareholders. Good chance that holes 41, 43, 45, 47, 49
and 50 haven't been drilled yet. Maybe you saved the map from early January and because of their location
and the Zone 390E discovery you would see they got put off to drill other locations based on PLS 38.
Time will tell but I think your agenda or beef prevents you from being objective. There are some pretty savvy
people on this board and so if you are going to throw stones please be sure to have "facts" to support your
throws otherwise wear "armour" because many of us will take the time to call bul*&%it if need be.
Full disclosure I have held DML.TO for 2 years and yes it has sat in this range for over a year.
Lev