Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Alpha Minerals Inc ESOFD



GREY:ESOFD - Post by User

Comment by NUCLEARon Mar 19, 2013 4:58pm
195 Views
Post# 21152169

RE: RE: RE: Sell the News

RE: RE: RE: Sell the News

You don't need to sell me on the great results....I'm convinced but as I stated previously, as a FIS shareholder I'm still invested in PLS (just like you) but I've spread my risk by also being in Waterbury and probably DML next month. Where takeovers are concerned, I'm sure even you would agree that the likelihood of someone buying out ONLY AMW to get their hands on the PLS deposit is very improbable. They would also take a shot at FIS as well. I cannot say the same for the reverse scenario. I could see someone trying to buyout FIS ONLY to get their hands on both PLS and Waterbury. Bottomline is that any takeover of AMW would also benefit FIS but not necessarily the other way around. Investing in AMW is basically putting all your chips in PLS. For me, investing in FIS is investing in PLS, Waterbury and DML. This is not a slight against AMW in any way...it's just a bit too risky for me with all my other uranium holdings

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>