Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Alpha Minerals Inc ESOFD

GREY:ESOFD - Post Discussion

Alpha Minerals Inc > Why so much skepticism?
View:
Post by straight4goal on Nov 25, 2013 10:34pm

Why so much skepticism?

I've been reading posts on both AMW and FCU bullboards and I am shocked to see so much hate directed towards FCU. From what I can gather both companies are great juniors and since they will merge very soon then the added benefits towards both stockholders will be tremendous. I happen to like FCU's COO and their management team has had a track record of succesful exploration ventures but AMW is a great company to invest in as well.

Why is there so much ammonosity, they're are going to join forces and maximize PLS's potential, and whatever prefence you have with either companies' management you can keep with their respective spinco. Its win-win for everyone.
Comment by classact on Nov 25, 2013 11:14pm
I think a lot of AMW owners have a problem with Dev and his used car salesman type reputation. I personally think he will get us a quick deal, maybe not the best deal. But that's OK by me,a bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush. He might also be able to induce a bidding war.
Comment by $tarbuxxonPender on Nov 26, 2013 4:13pm
Watch it classact. You are insulting a lot of used car salesmen out there. There will not be a takeover offer until PLS is a lot bigger (assuming back of envelope resource calculations are correct) Nothing is known on metallurgy  (or has been disclosed) Go listen to Camecos last conference call, they don`t know who they will sell Cigar Lake uranium to and predict no recovery in U prices til ...more  
Comment by bridgetonowhere on Nov 26, 2013 5:27pm
@$tarbuxxon - What do you mean "nothing is known on metallurgy."  All kinds of assays have been done and continue to be done.
Comment by Presclubs on Nov 26, 2013 9:37pm
My post from the sister board. You won't see the a post like this again by the Presclubs, a little venting tonight! LOL. _______ Well normally I wouldn't post on suck dribble, and try to stick to things that matter. BUT for this one time, I will make an exeption. I read a lot of posts today from the last week, after being away, and I am going to comment. The biggest car ...more  
Comment by Tarquin4 on Nov 27, 2013 10:36am
Your brilliance does not need to be repeated on both boards. We all read both boards
Comment by wintersun10 on Nov 27, 2013 2:46pm
tarquin you don't need to bash both boards as we read both boards....what is good for the gander apparently does not count for the traquin...
Comment by Tarquin4 on Nov 27, 2013 4:26pm
Not exactly the same thing. I post on either one indiscriminately but I don't post the EXACT same wording on both
Comment by wateroperator on Nov 27, 2013 11:13pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by $tarbuxxonPender on Nov 27, 2013 12:07pm
Pres Other than uranium and some gold numbers nothing has been released on what else is in the "ore" Its been stated its "clean" or low arsenic but no ICP results or thin section work has been released. I`m sure if AMW was operator this would have been done. If FCU has done it why not release it. All the hype on a takeover is BS because no major will even consider it without ...more  
Comment by hubber on Nov 27, 2013 2:02pm
If you look on news release dated 6-24 near the bottom it says----87.2% of samples had less then 50 parts per million of arsenic. That is very low .
Comment by wintersun10 on Nov 26, 2013 7:45pm
Cameco may have enough uranium(or so they say) but somebody is buying: About Uranium Prices
Comment by $tarbuxxonPender on Nov 26, 2013 8:06pm
Spot uranium chart looks bad which is hurting uranium stocks big time including AMW/FCU As to metallurgy read my post on the FCU site.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities