Eurocontrol Technics Ord EUCTF

RE:RE:RE:RE:Addendum

[shawshank]

zenvesting wrote: It takes a long time to do proper due dilligence for an acquisition, this getting wrapped-up within a year of when SIPCA initially expressed interest is actually fairly quick when you consider all the details disclosed in the information circular. Not really CIRUCULARS are by nature overburden with information-EUO is a small company with a small footprint....with world beating technology but not a world wide footprint...the deal between Dow Chemical- Dupont$130Billion deal once recieving regulatory approval will not take as long as what the whale (SICPA0 buying the Minnows (EUO) one  single operating arm  GFI/Petromark-this was not and should not have been  year long onerous affair. The timing might not be great for a hot trade in the market, but it's more than adequate to build a strong business going forward, were not concerned about timing as much as lack of visiblity/transparency and disclosure.  that will reward true long term shareholders in due time. The time is now,  Contradictory statement your making...first your saying the timing may not be good and reward comes in due time then your saying "The Time is Now".  Which is is...I would say the time of urgency for EUO was like...yesterday--- but lets be the devils advocate....Yes "the time is now"  that's what Rowlands told you in private vs public conversation and heading to Switzerland to aid in marketing efforts AHEAD of we the shareholders ratifying the vote.  SIPCA is not worried about waiting for this deal to close to begin marketing,  It  could actually be a regulatory body faux pas for SICPA to be doing any marketing ahead of a ratification vote but bully for them...CUZ Rowlands on the PR side is doing zilch by comparison.... they stole the key cookies fro the existing cookie jar and they know it...but where is Rowlands out pounding the PR and investement table like SICPA with the GFI  by comparison? here's another exciting news item from SIPCA  WRONG THIS MARKETING AHEAD OF THE VOTE WAS IS AND REMAINS NOT NEWS IT WAS FIRST CONTAINED IN A POST YOU PUT OUT VIOLATING REG FD. RULES AND REGULATIONS. This week in the international community and a newly trademarked name for GFI's technology Why should this be not surprising given SICPA is pounding the table ALREADY ahead of  the vote no doubt happy with glee they picked up GFI for just $16million up front....but what is surprising is that this trademark info ahead a ratification agreement is available given THERE IS NOT DEFINTIIVE AGREEMENT IN PLACE BEFORE THE RATIFICATION VOTE IS TABLED-that's why its called a ratification vote you flatulent jackass...out there to be found by those ambitious enough to do a little due dilligence.  DUE DILIGENCE IS NOT THE SAME AS HAVING PRIVATE DUE DIALOGUE WITH THE CEO  AS YOU HAVE BRAZENLY PUT UP IN A POST AND BEING POINTED OUT OR GIVEN DIRECTLY INFORMATION THAT IS NOT YET MADE AVAILABLE TO THE INVESTMENT COMMUNITY.  SEE PREVIOUS POSTS REGARDING 'THE UNLEVEL PLAYING FIELD' AND REG FD CONCERNS.  IMO Your arrogance with access will eventually catch up with you as I have open up a file of these types of posts that if sufficent in amount to proceed to the securities regulators I will do just that...in any event we will see what the Chairman of the BOD (Rowlands) has to say about your inability to keep things private once I talk to the party AFTER the shareholders Ratifty the definitive agreement with SICPA.The market rewards tho-should be an interesting conversation...what is the extension number again...maybe get Kid to email me on your behalf again. SS