Eurocontrol Technics Ord EUCTF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Addendum

[shawshank]

shawshank wrote: CORRECTED. STUPID STOCKHOUSE TECH ISSUES 

shawshank I found all the links to information  posted by searching Google for information that is in the public domain..Nope-tell it to someone else....I do research Your research is not better than anyone elses exposed to the markets-and are being fed or directed.... and only post when I have something of interest to contribute. Like what...quoting Rowlands as you feel free to do in the past and that dialogue complete with "just talked Rowlands" etc etc without it being public information?Feel free to report me to regulators, I do feel unencumbered if it makes you feel better. there is nothing illegal about using Google to do research.....Googles not the issue...you and your access is...but Please I implore you to continue...pretty please..in the vein of "mother may I" even... you need to go back and re-read the definitions I provided that explain the basic parameters of something that is considered a materiial event  I don't need you to lecture or school me on REG FD I don't breach them...IMO you do and have...So No...you need to re=-read what I provided you and this thread under the offical Canadian Reg FD rules and regulations in the provisions under non public information and its communication verses all the other non-material information and business philosophy and objectives that company management routinely discuss with investors. Nope...Very little if next to none what you put up as in the forward looking statements you make-has been discussed or disseminated to shareholders (reference my "unlevel playing field" commentary)  Rather than call the Chairman, I suggest you go to the special meeting and have the corporate council explain the regulations to you. I already have corporate counsel  (retired) in discussion and as a business partner and personal friend- also a shareholder -and following this thread and your posts inparticular from a personal due diligence perspective. BTW...couldn't stay away huh...I was on IP but that again proves to be decietfull in purpose and presentation.  I trust and hope you read this one to. SS