RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Back to cash againZen: If it wasn’t for the thoughts of shareholders like yourself and a few others, I would have completely sold out instead of keeping just enough to justify spending time on this critter in spite of ...
XwinSys ... The article you posted only underlines my concern. 2.5 or 3D package technology isn’t new. It’s been around for years but it’s NOW hitting its commercial stride which means the XwinSys systems should NOW be doing their thing in foundries around the world.
A bubble is of no use unless you’re in the bubble instead of just watching it float away! AG soil sampling ... At 2 feet you’re looking for a mine J
2 to 4” for pasture testing and 6 to 9” for tillage ground. Anything deeper than that actually provides misleading results.
https://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/proper_soil_sampling_depth_is_critical_for_pasture_soil_testing As for a drone’s down force requirement ... Land it, anchor it with a few hydrolic hooks, take your sample and move on to the next spot. Easily automated and no expensive and damaging boots on the ground.
Anyhow, you know very well what I was getting at ... I want my microcaps to think outside the box. Somewhat improving something which, as you well know, already exists
https://360yieldcenter.com/products/360-soilscan/ won’t move mountains and molehill moving microcaps are a dime a dozen.
Faith in management ... Faith belongs in a church and not in a portfolio. Confidence, yes but confidence needs to be earned and tends to be largely based on past performance ...
Last but not least, “objectivity” ... You are quite correct, the moment money is involved, complete objectivity flies out the window but there is one little thing investors tend to overlook:
Insiders tend to have more (money) at stake than shareholders. There are salaries, perks options and and and. Shareholders can walk away without turning their world upside down; insiders rarely.
So, what level of objectivity can we reasonably expect from insiders?