Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Eurocontrol Technics Ord EUCTF

"Eurocontrol Technics Group Inc is a Canada-based company involved in acquisition, development, and commercialization of security, authentication, verification and certification markets. The company through its subsidiaries is engaged in designing, manufacturing, marketing of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) systems, and developing technology and property that combines two... see more

OTCPK:EUCTF - Post Discussion

View:
Post by marketsense on Nov 28, 2015 10:00pm

Visibilty

SS, if everyone was as bullish as you are( and with good reason)  EUO would be trading North
of .40 right now.  The problem still is,  that nobody else is aware of these developements except
the posters on this board and other holders who can't be bothered with posting.  As of today,
EUO has virtually "O" visibility in the publics consciousness.   If EUO is going to get even North
of .30,  the visibility factor needs to raised by an extensive PR campaign funded out of some
the $16M cash they're getting.  This would be an excellent use of some of it and would show a
high return for use of capital IMO.   I understand that mgmnt needs to wait until the deal is 
ratified by shareholders but after that there can be no excuses for failing to pound the table.
While SIPCA may be private, EUO is not and its visibility needs a lot of lifting.
Comment by shawshank on Nov 28, 2015 10:29pm
Comment by zenvesting on Nov 29, 2015 10:49am
There is nothing "material" that has been discussed or said, it's all inconsequential discussion of business philosophy and market dynamics that is available to anyone who takes the extra step to reach out to the CEO with the contact information given at the bottom of every press release and engage him in a civil conversation. Likewise, because none of this information is material ...more  
Comment by lscfa on Nov 29, 2015 11:25am
The other problem is many cos. do not like to give forward guidance, and rely on analysts to estimate revenues, earnings, cash flows. But a company that does not raise money in the capital markets can not get analyst coverage. This was the case with RX. This pharma stock hasn't done a financing in forever and only recently started being covered by an investment bank probably because they hope ...more  
Comment by shawshank on Nov 29, 2015 11:57am
Comment by metals_boom on Nov 29, 2015 12:11pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by lscfa on Nov 29, 2015 2:36pm
EUO can avoid paying to have reports written if it would just share more info with its shareholders. e.g. Just how much will a IC wafer inspection unit sell for and what is the margin. From the images it looks like this equipment  is in the $100,000's.
Comment by zenvesting on Nov 29, 2015 12:31pm
Lscfa, I was also an early investor in RX.v, bought my shares @ $0.25, their CEO Rene has always made himself available to all shareholders in a similar fashion to what Bruce does here, you can call and talk to him anytime. Rene had always equally told anyone so motivated to call him the same information, they "have a pipeline of licensing candidates.....expect to introduce 2-3 new products a ...more  
Comment by lscfa on Nov 29, 2015 2:38pm
I am not getting the same responsive from Rowlands. He has yet to respond to my email asking about the tax hit on the $16 million sale. 
Comment by kidl2 on Nov 29, 2015 5:43pm
I bet you will get a "We can't comment" reply to your tax question which would make perfect sense based on my belief that they will not close the deal before Jan 01/16. By moving the closing into the next fiscal year they they postpone the whole tax issue for one full year during which they may make a "tax friendly" acquisition. In other words, it's quite possible that ...more  
Comment by shawshank on Nov 29, 2015 8:27pm
Comment by shawshank on Nov 29, 2015 11:56am
 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities