RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Exercise of Series B Warrants1sergedompierre wrote: yes but some companies like Trulieve for example are still growing every quarters . If you look at the alcohol industries when it began to be legal you can see the same pattern :a lots of new ones -if fact to many - some went bankrupt and others took the market . What i like about FAF id their main shareholder ACT who will become the majority owner within a year ...They have big money and are reknown for their eagerness to buy their competitors with time . My money is there on them .Watch them go in a year or 2 they will buy the weak ones ...and they will eventually open new stores inside their Circle K . They did that in Alberta for 2 Circle K and are very happy with the result . Small investment , no good will to buy for nothing like when an acquisition happen , great proven location ...
And yes i am very bullish for them ..let's just be patient it is coming...
Trulieve had to be responsible at the start since they can't get banking money.In Canada insiders became rich on the back of the shareholders, taking the worse decisions, building to many facilities. The CEO of TRUL bought $1 billions of shares, so she is confidant about Trul unlike the Insiders of our great companies with
no bought shares using their money. BtW FAF is not in the category of these above. The problem is the competition. No revenue, no profit, need to get money.
What i like about FAF id their main shareholder ACT who will become the majority owner within a year Can you provide the date on CEDAR? I saw a post you made about information on CEDAR so I assume you have the date. Don't send a link, it will not work. I want to read about it. It will not change anything until the Senate vote, not that I think FAF will do better soon, but because of the news, play the news.