RE:RE:Why was the Cat Lake section cut out from the interview?It is odd. I'm glad I saw it before they edited it out. If First Mining is trying to maintain a relatively neutral, facilitative position in terms of collaboration with the people of Cat Lake and the provincial government, I can see them wanting to be extra careful to not make it seem like they are biased in any way, even slightly, and so best to just not talk about it in hindsight, therefore cut it out of the video. Not that he said anything that would give that impression at all, I don't recall him doing that but it's possible in my view that they are just being extra careful not knowing how any given viewer might interpret what they see and hear. I believe Dan's heart and mind are in the right place based upon what I heard him say. He seemed frustrated at what has happened which is understandable but he also seemed patient empathetic towards the people of Cat Lake. Seems like a great leader to me. GLTA
masah88919 wrote: Just to add: Of course, this might be a decision from Crux investor to cut it out and might have nothing to do with Dan or First Mining. I get Crux investor is of course trying to promote this stock so they might think it's better to cut those "controversial" sections out. My opinion is that honesty is always the best policy, so still a bad move either way. This information is of course already known by the market anyways so it's discounted in the price.