Post by
4marlin on Apr 18, 2024 12:09pm
...and, once again: Nabta
If you are only looking for another Rottenstone size repeat then yes, they are drilling at the appropriate distance away to that which would form another current reference model repeat, but this is a scenario which will have a limited ability to appreciably provide a sufficient level of economic scale. That being said, given the apparent 10 km distance being seen to be in place where nickel bearing structural zones can be seen to be coming to surface (anticline peaks) to both the north-east and south of the Rottenstone reference point, that any major embayment (syncline in this case) which could host a much larger Rottenstone like setting at a scale which would be needed to be in place to really move the needle here (plus 25 million tons), would likely need to have at least 5km of elbow room to form. Very strong capacity to have a much larger Rottenstone type of deposit model have capacity to occur, would be approximately 5km to the north-east, and 5km to the south. This is also an environment observation which makes Albert Lake a far superior project region to have such a large deposit setting likely to occur over Gochager. Just my opinion of course based on my historical experience in such environments. Good luck here.