Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Birch Hill Gold Corp. FNTRF



GREY:FNTRF - Post by User

Birch Hill Gold Corp. > bottom fishing
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(1)
•••
Comment by drjekylon May 06, 2011 2:45pm
133 Views
Post# 18541580

RE: RE: bottom fishing

RE: RE: bottom fishingmikey, wesdome gold mines (t.wdo) owns ~60% of moss lake. moss lake owes them money. wesdome won't even let moss lake raise a disturbance without checking with them first. wesdome has 101mm shares outstanding trading at $2.60, they've got $23mm in the bank.
 
little to no upside for the average shareholder in the mok story because goliath owns it all. 
 
bad example.
 
what else do you got?
 
drj
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities