Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Global 8 Environmental Technologies Inc GBLE



GREY:GBLE - Post by User

Post by Tiktockon Oct 03, 2011 3:19pm
281 Views
Post# 19112933

Shareholder Letter - Vote for a New Board

Shareholder Letter - Vote for a New Board


A Crusade for Revenge VS. Having a Legal Shareholder Meeting re: Global 8:


Dear Shareholder,

My name is Bob Dittrich. I and my family own part of Global 8, just as you do. I am a plaintiff who helped fund and support a legal shareholder meeting and was active in electing the current board of directors of Global 8. I urge to you read this letter so that you will have a complete understanding of all events, as it is apparent that many of the facts have been hidden as a result of Daniel Wolf's deceit and greed. I have paid close attention to the efforts that Vince & Reese have made to ensure that we as shareholders will have an opportunity to cast equal votes to elect a new board of directors for Global 8. I feel that it is imperative we move ahead with this legal shareholder meeting, and have taken great care to lay out a testimonial that may shed some light before you vote.

Daniel Wolf: Not to be trusted

Mr. Daniel Wolf has essentially hijacked and squatted on our company. Wolf justifies his actions by asserting that money was spent wrongly, even though there were multiple audits, contracts and disclosures that show evidence to the contrary. Wolf's claims have only been verified by his personal lawyer Gwendolyn Smith. By clicking on the link below, you will hear evidence towards Wolf's real motives: to milk our company, and live as a squatter for free without any intention of building the company or any making contributions. Attached is audio of Daniel's Lawyer.

Another consistent theme of Wolf's is to take down Rene Branconnier, who is a director of Milverton Capital Corporation, a company that Daniel Wolf fired. Daniel Wolf and Roy Hales started a rumour about Rene Branconnier wanting to take control of Global 8 to ratify a contract that Milverton Capital Corporation had with Global 8 before their dismissal. This is impossible, as all contracts including the contract of Milverton Capital were approved by arms length directors, lawyers and auditors. Using this fairytale story as their crutch, Wolf and Hales have spread deceit and trickery amongst the shareholders for the last 23 months. Wolf and Hales along with their team of conspirators: Tad Simmons, John Thomas, Rick Boaisk, Ted Dreger, Nora Rose, and Bernice Church have tried to focus all attention on the defamation of Renee Branconnier, when these efforts should be toward holding the shareholder meeting where all parties can be heard. Link to

Audio of Daniel Wolf's Lawyer,

https://youtu.be/iW91lnAWinM

Daniel Wolf preyed upon weaker personalities to sway opinions their way. For example, Ted Dreger from Fort McMurray, who is in trouble with the RCMP, was harassed on the phone so much by Wolf that it became threatening. Wolf's mission was to call shareholders and talk to them about other individuals being investigated by the RCMP, attempting to sway votes his way, and this case it clearly back fired. This is all juvenile and there should be no place for this type of behaviour in our company.

Roy Hales: Not a Journalist

Roy Hales began his crusade with a website on which he acted like a yellow bellied journalist, a term that is described as 'a deceitful person that claims to be journalist so they can hide behind the legal definition of a journalist'. I have received numerous letters, emails, and phone calls from Roy Hales, Nora Rose Ted Dreger who are Wolf's cat paws and who I believe are included in the plot to destroy our company. Roy began his crusade with illegal mail outs to us shareholders and a website that contains nothing but yellow bellied journalism. Roy Hales is not and has never been a journalist, but is in fact a professional painter. I still have my shares in GBLE unlike Roy who brags to shareholders he made money on GBLE and paid for his daughter’s wedding with the profits. In reality, Hale's stock transactions were made during a crease trade, and he actually sent out instructions to shareholders on how to sell stock under a cease trade. There is no way Roy understands how to run a public company. I for one, will put my chips with executive businessmen and business women who have a track record. You all want the ability to make this choice don’t you? Does Roy Hales realize that I own part of this company too? His slanderous acts and and statements are completely one sided and should be taken as such.

Us shareholders want proxies sent out so that a vote can take place professionally, legally and publicly. Numerous updates were sent from Vince & Reese or Chad Burback displaying consistent professionalism with one ultimate goal: to have a proxy vote. Daniel Wolf, John Thomas, Roy Hales, Ted Dreger, Rick Boaisk were too coward to support a simple shareholder meeting until they were able to slander, destroy, delay, frustrate and confuse, the shareholders with their propaganda.

Richard Hawkins: Unfit Auditing & Fueled by Resentment

I want to layout out further events that took place so that you are correctly informed about Mr. Richard Hawkins:

Richard Hawkins visited Rene Branconnier in Langley BC the fall of 2009. At the meeting Rene Branconnier asked Richard Hawkins to recommend a legal firm to work with him and the shareholders towards having a shareholder meeting for Global 8. The reason being that Daniel Wolf and his group had fired Milverton Capital Corp and the shareholders were asking Rene Branconnier and Chad Burback for support and help. Branconnier knew of Richard Hawkins because he was a former auditor for Global 8 Environmental Technologies. Richard Hawkins came to this meeting with the intention of enticing Rene Branconnier to join his group, which included the highly regarded David Reese from Salt Lake City. Richard Hawkins was going to use his group of public companies for his own private plans. Mr. Hawkins had a reputation for being very aggressive towards his clients, demanding more money throughout the audit process. When his demands weren't met, Mr.Hawkins would blackmail his clients and wouldn’t sign off. His record shows a list of companies that have stopped using him, all of whom will confirm these facts. Hawkins was the auditor for Duro Enzyme and EAPI and had to resign because he was an auditor for too long. Hawkins then came back to work for Global 8, during which time his filings disclose techniques used to get maximum return for the audits, which caused conflict between the board of directors and external consultants of Global 8. Hawkins was then professionally replaced. He became resentful against David Reese, Milverton Capital Corp and Rene Branconnier and decided he was going to work for Daniel Wolf and his group of squatters. Now Hawkins and Wolf are in court declaring allegations against our company. The question is: Does Richard Hawkins represent a professional firm and does he qualify to do audits and get paid to do so? The statement that Richard Hawkins gave either means he is a liar in court or he is a lair to the SEC. Did he approve and file unprofessional statements? Should Richard Hawkins be acting for any company while it is unclear whether he can properly or legally do the job? When did Richard Hawkins really lie in court or to the SEC? Why do Daniel Wolf, Roy Hales, John Thomas, Rick Boaisk, Nora Rose, Ted Dreger want an auditor who is oblivious to which statements he has signed, and if they were even correct or accurate? We as shareholders paid Richard Hawkins to complete an audit which he signed off on. Is Richard’s revenge so great or is after more money?

Daniel Wolf refuses to leave the board after being voted out:

Vince & Reese were contacted after the recommendation from Richard Hawkins in the fall of 2009. The shareholders put money towards a retainer fee for their law firm to assist us. Vince & Reese prepared the written shareholder consent forms in November 2009. The shareholders voted in an enormous favor to cast out Daniel Wolf and vote in the new board. Despite the shareholders vote being completed legal and transparent Daniel Wolf refused to leave. In November 2009 more shareholders called upon Milverton Capital Corporation to help with the shareholder meeting against Daniel Wolf for not honouring the shareholder vote that took place weeks before. What should have been a month process still continues to drag on to this day 23 months later. Once Wolf said he would not leave and would squat on Global 8, Vince & Reese started legal procedures against Daniel Wolf for not honouring the shareholder vote. In the meantime Daniel attempted to extort money in a settlement he proposed and drew up bogus agreements which were unacceptable in December 2009.

Daniel Wolf, Roy Hales, Ted Dreger, John Thomas and a few other supporters then raised money in Alberta and BC under a cease trade order to fund a lawyer to delay the process of a shareholder meeting for Global 8. Ted Dreger brags to shareholders that he put in 15 thousand dollars to delay the meeting and Wolf gave him a promissory note for shares. Over the course of this court case Wolf and his group issued over 14,000,000 GBLE shares to Daniel Wolf’s group. For what? As you can see Daniel Wolf has no intention of having a legal shareholder meeting. How is having a simple shareholders’ meeting hard for anyone to understand? Daniel Wolf has no money invested and shares no vision with the shareholders. Daniel Wolf has obviously come from very low means before these events, and has used all of us shareholders to pay his rent and play his game. Roy Hales, Tad Simmons, John Thomas, Nora Rose, Ted Dreger, Bernice Church and Rick Boaisk must be seriously questioned about turning a blind eye to Daniel Wolf's crimes.

Gwendolyn Smith: Professional Squatter, Lawyer to Daniel Wolf

The lawyer that Daniel Wolf, Roy Hales, Ted Dreger and John Thomas hired attended the court hearings and prepared Wolf’s case and appeared in Las Vegas Nevada beside Daniel Wolf. The lawyer they hired is an accused serial squatter Gwendolyon Smith who has a colorful history of moving into a home and then not paying rent. It takes some owners up to 18 months to remove her. This can all be confirmed by this link I have attached for your reference. Judge Elliot Daum concluded Smith maliciously and manipulatively stopped paying rent after she moved into Wilt’s apartment. The Judge ordered her to pay $42,500 in back rent and damages. Another $80,000 judgment was made in Wisconsin and there are numerous other landlord-tenant cases in Hawaii, Arizona, Delware and Missouri. Here is a link with more detailed information regarding the Wilt case:

https://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20101104/ARTICLES/101109728?p=2&tc=pg


Note, Daniel Wolf proceeded to have a relationship with this woman.
Daniel Wolf, Gwendolyon Smith, Roy Hales, Ted Dreger , Nora Rose, Bernice Church and John Thomas have delayed and squatted on our company for 23 months.

Gwendolyon Smith has now contacted Chad Burback and Rene Branconnier asking them for money and is willing to join forces with them to go after Daniel Wolf and his crew. Miss Smith was defrauded by Daniel Wolf, Roy Hales, John Thomas, Ted Dredger, Tad Simmons and Rick Bosiak by a written contract. Miss Smith was not able to cash cheques that Daniel Wolf gave her and they came back NSF. She is bitter and willing to betray her allies of the past. We at the advice of David Reese only want to proceed with a shareholder meeting that proposed over 23 months ago. The fact that this meeting has has yet to happen has caused major confusion, destroyed innocent people, division amongst family, friends and neighbours. Gwendolyon Smith is very accurate about one thing: She states that Daniel has major psychological issues. It causes one to question if Daniel Wolf is competent or qualified to issues shares of our company?

Shareholder Meeting Delayed - Why Can't We Vote Yet?

You all would have received the notice for the shareholder meeting ordered by the court and proxies that were to follow in the mail. We received our notice. But Daniel Wolf was able to find another snake to support his game and has succeeded in preventing any proxies to be sent out. David Church, Bernice Church and Nora Rose are attempting to turn all focus to the defamation of Rene Branconnier instead of supporting a proxy for the shareholder meeting. This meeting was ordered by the court and Vince & Rees completed the approval process with the United States Securities Commission.Daniel Wolf was ordered to complete a proxy which to this day he has failed to complete. Fernando Londe, Shane Thibulat and Donald Dyer have all signed off on the proxies to be sent out and prepared for the October 7, 2011 meeting, but Bernice Church and has refused to sign the proxy statement and therefore there will not be any proxies sent out to any shareholders.

Bernice Church has been seen dancing and saying that they are going to take down Rene Branconnier and Chad Burback even at the expense of all the shareholders. Is that right of her? What game is she playing? Is revenge that important to her? Bernice Church has spoken with Daniel Wolf, Ted Dreger, Roy Hales and John Thomas and has refused to honour a meeting as her husband David Church says "It was his last card to play". They have a few cards left to play such videos, recordings, poeple in jail that can verify about how they were treated. When we all live in glass houses you would think that David and Berince would not be throwing stones and should inform their friends of the same. It is disappointing that we all did this hard work just to have David Church and Bernice Church, two dissents, ruin and delay this vote once again. With more research David Church the owner of A1 Transmission in Red Deer Alberta is band from entering the USA on drug charges. A search found that Bernice Church and David Church have their own business problems. https://www.ripoffreport.com/auto-dealer-repairs/a-1-red-deer-transmi/a-1-red-deer-transmissions-lim-587ce.htm

Daniel Wolf did not even complete a proxy, did not have it approved by the SEC but yet Nora Rose figures she has the right to solicit us shareholders for votes. Isn’t this a federal offence? I have seen emails that she sent soliciting those votes as I received one of them. Nora Rose has no right to solicit us shareholders before a shareholder meeting and she must follow the rules of the SEC and the court order just like everyone else. Will Nora Rose and Bernice Church be the cause of the delayed vote once again? Nora Rose and Ted Dreger touted to shareholders that Daniel Wolf is going to make them millionaires. Is this bribery, manipulation or misrepresentation to the shareholders? How can Daniel Wolf who has proven nothing but incompetence and never succeeded at anything, make us millions?

60,000,000 Shares Issued at a Penny - Ethical? Legal?

You will see that there has been a huge amount of shares emptied from Global 8’s company treasure. Over 60,000,000 million shares were issued to Wheatware, Tad Simmons and Donald Christen. Bernice Church and David Church are in obvious support of this incompetent business decision by Daniel Wolf. Who issues 60,000,000 million shares? What for? I have a major concern about this.

I’m disappointed with Nora Rose who paid money to support a shareholder meeting, and then sends me emails harassing me and my wife to vote for Daniel Wolf, Roy Hales, Rick Boaisk, Ted Dreger, Tad Simons, and John Thomas. Why wouldn’t Roy Hales, Nora Rose, John Thomas, Daniel Wolf, Ted Dreger, and Rick Bosiak put on their website that they issued themselves or companies they are closely associated with over 60,000,000 shares? These shares were issued at a penny; no actual cash has even been paid for them. They issued themselves control of the company at a penny while we shareholders paid 50 cents a share. Is this ethical? We paid 50 cent they got shares at a penny - When will we make money? How much will they make before it reaches the price we paid for our shares? Is this in the best interest of shareholders or is this a crime?

45,000,000 shares issued to Wheat Ware Due Diligence

45 million GBLE shares issued to Wheat ware or an assocaited company of theirs recently filed for chapter 11 bankrupty. We sharehodlers are to share revenue with Wheatware? What due diligence was completed?

https://www.findabankruptcylawyer.com/Latest-News/2010/March/Wheatware-Products-Enters-Chapter-11.aspx

Closing Remarks - Shareholder Meeting

I invested in Global 8 because it is a company that has external and internal accountants, auditors and lawyers. Everything is fully disclosed and filed with EDGAR, open to the public to review and read. It is very well structured with great vision, great opportunity, backed by a professional company with audited financial statements. This company was building active shareholders and was an active market for liquidity for all.

I am disgusted that my investment has been held up for this long with no direction and no value. There will be no proxies sent out but the shareholder meeting will still go on Oct 7, 2011. Our lawyers Vince & Rees will hold and chair the meeting. Daniel Wolf is not allowed to chair the meeting; a direct order from the Court of Nevada. There are so many irregularities in what Nora Rose, Roy Hales, John Thomas, Daniel Wolf, Tad Simmons, Rick Bosiak did towards our proxy vote. Nora Rose and her cohorts breached major SEC rules and did not obey the court order. I question the true motives of Bernice Church and Nora Rose, who may have played a much larger role in destroying our company, just to get some free shares that Daniel Wolf and John Thomas were handing out.

Should our group disqualify the meeting on October 7, 2011? The plaintiff shareholders, lawyers, Milverton Capital Corp, Rene Branconnier and Chad Burback followed the rules, and have set up a meeting which we all wanted. While we were successful in setting up this shareholder meeting we were not successful with the proxies because of a handful of crooks. They hope to succeed in having a vote on October 7, 2011 based on one twisted, distorted view from directors Daniel Wolf, Roy Hales, Ted Dreger, Nora Rose, Rick Bosiak, and John Thomas. It is my intention to draw light to the other side of the story, and I thank you in taking the time to read this. I hope you will now make a more informed vote.

Regards,

Bob Dittrich

Global 8 Shareholder

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>