RE:RE:Are Trolls part of Stockhouse's Business Model ?I think because of the anonymity, Stockhouse is able to have many random posters who are not held accountable for anything they say. The Facebook group for TBP might be a better option for now I guess, but it's also quite small. Soon enough, I'm sure, we'll see a large uptick in members pending Q3 2018 news and PPP001 news.
Just out of curiousity, do you think that your average investor prefers:
a) learning only the positives of a company, and not doing the necessary DD, but to blindly only focus on the positives, or
b) see only the negatives of a stock, and choose to stay away from a company, or
c) learning both the positives and negatives, so that an investor can assess the company as a whole, and make an investment based on DD provided by all, with no glaring holes of misinformation. This way they can make an investment in the best interests of themselves, which is the whole point of this, right?
I personally pick C, as I think that everyone deserves a full picture of a company, and not JUST the positives, and not JUST the negatives. At the same time, I can understand why this board is filled with positive messages, as Tetra seems to deliver positive news quite often.
Hey, and with Gmack saying he's backing off, maybe this mediating did do something. I think he just wanted to be heard. Would you look at that. Let's hope for a clean board now!
GLTA