LeafRider wrote: Okay so others are now "well informed" from the almighty SweetyDi... Whatever has been completed thus far in the phase 3 clinical trial "will not have to be repeated". That is what we know... BUT Not a single person from Tetra has claimed nor stated that the PPP001 ph.3 trial has been completed. So your assumption is misleading by saying it doesn't have to be "repeated... "
I am not arguing with you. I am restating a fact that you seem comfortable leaving out. Maybe you should revise your assumptions to accurately reflect what Edward Miller has stated, especially if you're so passionate about not spreading false statements? ...
Here I'll help you out a little, "The progress made on PPP001's ph.3 clinical trial to-date will not have to be repeated, but we have no information that identifies that IN FACT that PPP001 ph.3 clinical trial is completed to-date, which implies that at least a portion of the ph.3 trial is considered completed"... Is that better?
You did read that, (paraphrased) "All the patients currently taking PPP001 were notified to stop taking the drug..." - That implies that some patients were still participating within the ph. 3 clinical trial. So again, you feel as though taking IR statements out of full context of what we know is better for you to get your FASLE STATEMENT across.
You know that PP001 is NOT COMPLETE! Give me break already, you're still lying! There is ZERO implication from Tetra Management that ph.3 clinical is complete, none. Just you implying it, so maybe it's you that is the pumper. Right now you're the only one trying to support circumstancial evidence that the phase 3 clinical is over, why is that? We simply don't know that, and implying that is is SweetyDi's interpretation and no one elses... Move on it's okay to be wrong, at this point you're proving my point.
For there record there is no "anger" here, just defending something you continue to misinform people on. I think your anger with me is shining through, remember the share price went down today because of other factors, not because of me. I am not the cause of you and I losing money here, don't shoot the messanger okay.
Sweeetydi wrote: Leaf, I give Edward credit that he knows who I am.
Also, I’m not sure where your anger comes from, but please stop. I assume we are all adults here and with that should come a tone to have a discussion / difference of opinion.
The company has said phase 3 won’t need to be repeated. Saying that in itself implies it’s finished, but I’ll go on.
The NR outlines
“This unexpected development will result in a 6-month delay in the submission of the Canadian New Drug Submission or Drug Identification Number (DIN) application for PPP001.”.
That translates to me that the DIN application, which was originally due to happen Q1 2019, is delayed by 6 months.
I have made my comment on multiple social media outlets that Edward, Guy and other management follow. If I were making a ludicrous or defamatory statement, I would hope someone would’ve corrected what I was saying.
Hopefully this further explains why I hold the opinion I have. That’s my interpretation. You’re entitled to have a different view.