GREY:GYPHQ - Post by User
Comment by
red911on Oct 01, 2012 7:58am
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0341-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
162 Views
Post# 20432493
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Kiwi's last post
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Kiwi's last post Belgie... There is no difference here than Waterton debt agreement with SGN. If SGN can repay their debt with a propoerty like Mineral Ridge than GGN can certainly do the same with Borealis. Don't forget they have ONLY been messing around here with old waste heaps and dumps during this initial startup process/period. They have yet to start actual mining. Actual mining (i.e MUCH higher grades and recoveries) will begin before the end of December. My guess is it may be sooner in light of recent $5M financing. The capital requirements are now fullfilled.
Despite what share price says, it's not all doom and gloom here. GGN has a producing heap leach operation, are expanding its capacity fro 4-12M tonnes, and will start moving from old waste material to viring ore in short order.
GGNs goal is to reach 25K-30K Au per year rate at $600-700 /oz Au costs by December 2012. If they do this $18M market cap will be history.
Questions for you... What was SGNs production rate in its FIRST YEAR of production? What was SGNs market cap? Compare to GGN. IMO the answers to these two questions will indicate to anyone GGN is severely undervalued here, even with production delays.
But we'll see.