RE:RE:RE:new interviewYes, they tried to explain the 30% improvement that doesn't come out of today's news release numbers and graph.
The explanation was changing the testing protocol which would be long and boring to explain. BT stated that this is the continuation of the May 15 NR and highlighted that this NR is "average" of three batteries whereas May 16 was establishing "maximum" capacity.
i think the news release could have been written better without making it long and boring. I see "average" in the May 16 news release, I don't see "maximum".
He also explained that the NR was vetted by pHd's. Not to generalize but I have some experience in this area and pHd's in that work were not necessarily the best communicators.
On we go. Commercial interest once the research is done will dictate our battery fortunes. Lots going on in the space so timing is important IMO.