Invictus MD Strategies Corp IVITF

If anyone from Invictus' management follows this board......

[uncleblackie]

Dropping your "Evangelical Officer"  was the best thing to happen to the company in quite a while. While appearing to be a humorous tongue in cheek position within the company, it actually came off to me anyways as making the company appear amateurish and corny looking. (Sorry Gene, I love ya man and you where one of my idols growing up but people are age just don't appeal to the millenials).

Changing the symbol was a very bad move.  The reason now becomes obvious as to why management shouldn't have allowed the symbol change in the first place. Even without the star power name attached to the stock symbol, the symbol GENE itself does nothing to reflect the company name or product. The invictus name and current stock symbol both need to change as it was never sexy or catchy to begin with. In fact, GENE itself would be a great stock symbol for a genome company. Yes, I know that could also include gene splicing pot plants as well but when you include Simmons as the spokesperson as well as changing the stock symbol to GENE it came off as nothing more than an ego driven publicity stunt that managment stupidly agreed to and are now either stuck with the symbol in which case they might be able to capitalize on it by also renaming the company (in which case the new company name also needs to include the word "gene" so the stock symbol becomes part of "The Brand" which is a marketing tool in itself)........ or,  rebrand completely away from both the stock symbol GENE and current company name and come with an all new shorter and sexier name and stock symbol.

Whatever the underlying meaning of the current company name is, is irrelevant.
If you want to attract attention and interest then you need a catchy branding that your current name and completely disconnected stock symbol will not accomplish plain and simple.

You need to keep it to a maximum of two words and short as possible. Even dropping the word "strategies" and just rebranding as "invictus MD" would even be an improvement but even that name still doesn't  incorporate or demonstrate to the world what type of "MD" your company is so I think you could do even better than a shortened version of the current company name.

Yes I know there are companies with names like Khiron and others that also do nothing to demonstrate through their name or stock symbol what type of company they are either but that's not the point.

The point is you can do better than them and the current company name and start attracting real attention to yourself. So come up with a name that's shorter and better and start building that "cult following"  that GENE promised you, all on your own!

I've been a shareholder for quite a while at $1.47 and while I will give current management the benefit of the doubt when it comes to competently running the day to day operations of the company, it's clear to everyone that they have failed miserably in the marketing and branding department.

It's time to start making more deals and JV with other LP's and other industry related businesses especially in Latin America as that's where all cbd production is moving to due to low cost of operation and much longer growing season.

If you do things right you won't need a "Gene", a "Snoop", the trailer park boys, or any other over the hill stars to push your brand that nobody growing up today will ever connect with.