Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

L&L Energy, Inc. LLEN

"L & L Energy Inc is currently engaged in the business of coal mining, coal consolidation, and wholesaling in the People's Republic of China and its operations are conducted in the coal-rich Yunnan Province in Southwest China."


OTCPK:LLEN - Post by User

Post by longonsinoon Oct 01, 2013 10:12am
253 Views
Post# 21780878

PR called me back

PR called me back
Excuse my prying and my lack of knowledge of LLEN, but PR called me back (I said I was a long time shareholder, a big white lie). I voiced my concerns, about Sino Forest similarities. He had some good points, that after 2011, the SEC scrutinized all companies (maybe especially Chinese) much more stringently. That LLEN was always a US company not an RTO. Management is buying back shares, institutions are also. Had 2 auditors working alongside each other (or something like that). So I am more comfortable of going long on this one (with a small position anyway). He said one by one, the company is commited to release info to knock down each allegation, the company is trading at 20% of book value, and he is 100% confident in the company (heard that one before, but anyway). My biggest concern was that a few t's or i's are not dotted in the records, even if the assets are not materially different, but I'm thinking now that should not be the deciding factor.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>