Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Lightstream Resources Ltd. LSTMF

"Lightstream Resources Ltd is engaged in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in Western Canada. Its operating areas include Southeastern Saskatchewan, Central Alberta, and North-Central Alberta."

GREY:LSTMF - Post Discussion

Lightstream Resources Ltd. > Bond Holders Pissed
View:
Post by darkstream on Jul 14, 2016 7:08am

Bond Holders Pissed

It appears the two Bond Holders Wright screwed last year will not allow this latest proposal to go forward. They need another plan very quickly. This Ad Hoc committee seems to be made up of 1st lien holders and they are just blowing smoke. Its time for the first lien holders to move the credit line back up to net neutral. Whats the difference. The money has been eaten and schitt out already and they would get it back on a future foreclosure should that happen. Currently LTS is generating $5M US a month on $45 oil. Should oil ultimately stabilize over $50 they would be viable. Wright should pay the bondholders $25M today with a promise to pay $5M a month until the interest due is made whole. Tell the 1st lien holders to Schitt or get off the pot.
Comment by orlandofl on Jul 14, 2016 8:10am
Secured debt holders are good with the deal - understandibly as they get 95%, 2nd lien don't like it - not sure what will be negotiated or if they go to court over restructure - similar to bankruptcy in the US - shareholders I guess don't have a lot of say and probably approve it.
Comment by PeterWright on Jul 14, 2016 9:05am
It will be interesting to see how the two lawsuits effect things. Will they settle? Will it slow down the process? I can't find any updated information. Lots of moving parts, hopefully it all works out. Still no reason to own this name at this point.
Comment by darkstream on Jul 14, 2016 9:25am
-the law suits could stall foreclosure dreams indefinitely and should be delayed as long as possible -sent Wright an email this morning -told him this deal is already dead and asked him to concentrate on his 7M common shares instead of his job preservation -this deal reeked of self service and I stated that their were better options -told him his me me me attitude will get him voted out in ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities