Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mart Resources Inc MAUXF



OTCPK:MAUXF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by dr_airtimeon Apr 26, 2012 11:51am
147 Views
Post# 19839080

Umu-9 Sands Slide 11 of Presentation

Umu-9 Sands Slide 11 of Presentation

Look at page 11 at the size of the big blue oil sand they have at the bottom of the deviated Umu-9 well. Note the JV's interpretation of the size of these new Umu-9 sands which correlate to to cross-section green sands ("New Discoveries" of XVIIa-XXb from Umu-9 on slide 13.)


After you've contemplated this for a bit, go back up to slide 8 which has the resource model of the entire Umu field with the fault and note that this blue area (XVIIa  and deeper) is not included in this model. If these deeper sands propogate as wide as the upper sands on the slide 8 field resource model then you can see why Oullins was calling Umu-9 a "transformative well".

It doesn't look like they are interpreting the lower blue (XVIIa and deeper from slide 11) abutting up against the fault if both slides 8 & 11 are cross-sections looking from the same direction.

Thoughts?

Bullboard Posts