MGX Minerals Inc MGXMF

NANO + STEAM REFORM ( peper proving MgC2 ) better hydrogen

[Wangotango67]

Perhaps both processes would be best -

MgCO3 + NaCL = MgCl2 + Na2CO3

Intoduce nano filtration
= seaprate the MgC12 = separate the Na2CO3

Sell Na2CO3 - ( Fertilizer or lithium sector as a 5.32 x LCE multiplier ) 

MgCl2 - steam reform. ( smr )


NOW READ THIS PAPER ON - MgCL2 vs METHANE - steam reformation

#1 - SMR - used to split methane gas to produce hydrogen. ( carbon issue + ghg + less effective )
#2 - SMR - used to split MgCl2 ( no green house gas, no carbon, higher volume of hydrgoen )

System 1 - 28.4–18.4%
System 2 - 43.2–27.4%


Same SMR  process applied to - MgCl2 to split hydrogen...
Mg–Cl cycle can be considered as a promising thermoelectrochemical cycle for water splitting because of its simplicity and applicability as well as possessing higher energy and exergy efficiencies and stability of chemical reactions throughout the cycle.
Credit -  2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

LINK -
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274459765_Thermodynamic_and_environmental_impact_assessment_of_steam_methane_reforming_and_magnesium-chlorine_cycle-based_multigeneration_systems_Comparative_exergy-based_environmental_impact_assessment



Perhaps the chloride conversion then nano filtration would be a cheap initial phase
then... introduce SMR - 

Now... what would a  MgCL2 concentrate produce - higher yields of hydrogen ?
Would the 42.3% increase exponentially ?
Ahhhh.....
 
In mining... it's all about out performing your competitor...
Cheaper process.
No carbons.
No green house gases.
Higher yields.
More Profits.



Just ideas...