If MgCO3 + Oxalate Acid creates,
Magnesium Oxalate + Water = Carbon Dioxide + Brucite + Tritium Oxalate Acid -
This sounds far easier of a method to crerate - tritium - than...
Breeding tritium in lithium blankets - with in a reactor.
LithiumBlanket
The amount of energy used in a reactor = amount of tritium created in lithium blankets.
Iinvolves the hit and miss of " hoping " a particle breeds with a lithium particle.
Sounds like a cr-ap shoot. I decided to search out the formula again - just to be sure.
FIRST PHASE
I typed in - MgCO3 + C2H2O4 ( oxalate )
=
C2MgO4 + CH2O3 SECOND PHASE
C2MgO4 + H2O
= Carbon Dioxide + Brucite + Tritium
As of now... That's the only answer i can find online.
Odd it is.. .last eve i also came across the formula versions too.
Not this time. I wonder if they've been - scrubbed.
I wouldn't be surprised, an Mgo deposit being able to hatch
Tritium - would be worth some serious - $$$$
Perhaps far cheaper to breed H3 this method than in a fission reactor.
To add, the formula is using - MgO - NOT Mg metal.
MgO is already with in the deposit ores.
It's just a matter of cleaning the impurities out,,,, or would one have to ?
Could one keep both - MgCO3 + CaCO3 in ore mix ? CaC2O4 + H2O → CaO + H2C2O4
There's the calcium oxide
so perhaps one could keep the - Mg + Ca in ore mix - and introduce the oxalate.
Doesn't suggest the - hydrogen or carbon off gasses. If it did a small g would show.
= Magnesium hydroxide
= Calcium hydroxide
= Tritium ? - or would the calcium affect the magnesium reaction ?
Kind of good to check to see what calcium does in reaction to, oxalate.
Such proves - magnesium does something to the hydrogen in water to create the - H3.
All about the MgO.
And maybe... havving the calcium with magnesium wouldn'y affect the H3 formation.
Fission splits a heavy element (with a high atomic mass number) Fusion joins two light elements (with a low atomic mass number), forming a heavier element.
If Tritium is formed by way of, Magnesium Oxalate + H2O
Then it would be a - fusion process - correct ?
What i don't like with the answers online is...
They label Tritium as radioactive.
They use the examples of ( fission ) reaction - spent fuel - after a reaction. of course it will be radioactive.
So... why is tritium being labelled radio active - when there's also a fusion form ?
Based on my limited knowledge on this subject - i would say, it's not radioactive due to a fusion reaction of bonding occured - no fission.
Could we say they're are two forms of, Tritium ?
one made by fusion - bond -
one made by fission - high reaction - made in reactor.
What does online say ? ( first time checking ) Does hydrogen fusion emit radiation?
Nuclear fission power plants have the disadvantage of generating unstable nuclei; some of these are radioactive for millions of years. Fusion on the other hand does not create any long-lived radioactive nuclear waste There we go.
Not radioactive because its a - fusion bond.
So... i guess the next question is...
Could H3 ( Tritium ) be used as a fuel for reractors ( minus the fission ) = no radiation.
Yeah.. it can.
Next question ?
How much energy can an H3 provide ?
Without resorting radioactive H3 - all because it's life span may be affected due to the radioacitve.
The answer would have to come from - H3 derived by non fission and only by,
fusion. clean fusion H3 gas.
Makes me wonder if.
H3 could bond to mag hydride or in paste ?
i did come across a few searches that said it was considered as, rocket fuel for space travel.
And... for ( reactor ) energy - different than, fission nuclear reactor.
Which makes me wonder if they're wanting to use clean H3 - over the Duet + Trit reaction...?
It would certainly be a cleaner burn without the radiation.
Wish i knew how much energy is given off in a burn using - FUSION - CLEAN - H3.
I wonder if its as simple as, 3x the power of a hydrgoen molecule ?
Since it's a triple bond ?
Anyways...
This subject i feel lost in...
Certainly not a subject i've ever deleved into.
I'm more into ionic salt batteries - and - still waiting for a good laugh when they finally realize that
concentrated salt aquifers are already battery storage banks - loaded with ionic charged ions from the magnestic - telluric currents...
Cheers...
If i've gotten anything wrong...
By all means, chime in and correct.
Thanks...