Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mercator Minerals Ltd MLKKF

Mercator Minerals, Ltd. is a mineral resource company engaged in the mining, exploration, development and operation of its mineral properties in Arizona, United States and Sonora, Mexico. The Company’s principal assets are the 100% owned Mineral Park Mine, a producing copper-moly mine located near Kingman, Arizona and the El Pilar Project located in Sonora Mexico. The primary focus of the Company is the expansion of copper production and molybdenum concentrate production at the Mineral Park Mine, and the development of the El Pilar Project. Its other projects include The El Creston molybdenum property, which is 175 kilometers south of the United States Border and 145 kilometers northeast of the city of Hermosillo; Molybrook, which is located on the south coast of Newfoundland, and Ajax, which is located 13 kilometers north of Alice Arm, British Columbia.


GREY:MLKKF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by Sharpie009on May 02, 2010 2:26pm
539 Views
Post# 17053917

Musings on Mercator

Musings on MercatorPatience is the key with this stock.  2009 was a challenging year given their commissioning issues which was partly driven by financial constraints.  Going forward financing issues have been resolved and the balance sheet looks strong.  The debt has been renegotiated favorably which in my opinion opens the door for a takeover bid in the not too distant future .  In my humble opinion TCM is the logical acquirer. 

Had some fun trying to reconcile their financials for the last two quarters September 2009 and December 2009 but to no avail.  Was trying to tie out their  financial results to the quarterly financial numbers presented in the Management Discussion and Analysis (the infamous page 10).  The financials clearly showed the loan covenant violation happening in the last quarter (December 2009) however the numbers presented in the MDA analysis(page 10) show EBIT being below the interest expense amount in the third quarter ending September.  Looks as if they would have been in breach in September had  expenses been accounted for in the correct quarters.  I don't think the books have been cooked as was suggested by another poster but would agree that given that December marked the end of the fiscal year and entailed a full blown audit the fourth quarter quarter would have had to include any additional costs incurred during the year but not yet reported in prior quarters.  Because previous quarters were unaudited it appears to me that the third quarter did not include all the costs that they probably should have (Accruals were understated). Not done deliberatly but more a function of the accounting process.  As a result third quarter results appear better than they were and fourth quarter results worse than they actually were since the auditors would have ensured that all full year costs were picked up in December even though some of these costs might have related to August or September. Basically for the full year expenses are correct but the third and fourth quarters are distorted.  I think that mangement in the MDA is trying to show results as if they had been properly recorded in the correct quarters which actually makes the fourth quarter not that bad.
In addition if management already knows that 2009 is a poor year financially speaking management would want to make sure that all costs are recorded in 2009 so that going forward in 2010 results will look more favourable. 
I wait with anticipation for the first quarter results which will be out in less than two weeks.
Bullboard Posts