Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Halo Collective Inc. N.HALO

Alternate Symbol(s):  N.HALO.WT.C | HCANF



NEO:HALO - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by ArtBechsteinon Jan 18, 2007 3:04pm
139 Views
Post# 12044356

RE: Pulacayo tailings awarded not to APE

RE: Pulacayo tailings awarded not to APEI thought this over and over today wit hthe tailings and now I'm convinced that probably no one wanted this deal because it's much more effective to focus on the metal-rich veins and/or open pit a the Paca dome. Wouldn't draw any conclusions was just a bit surprised that APE never addressed this issue to us shareholder. Honestly I'm quite excited to see the BFS associated with the 43-101 compliant resource estimate for Paca. The fact APE doesn't have a 43-101 compliant resource is in my view the main reason behind the Bolivia-mass for the underapreciation of the financial community. Look at companies like Esperanza Silver or Mag Silver...no production ahead and no 43-101 compliant resources but valuation of 148m$ and 275m$ - but not in Bolivia... Would you like to share your information regarding the APE staff applying for a job in Argentina (can inbox me). Thx Art
Bullboard Posts