RE:RE:Just a post ("no big whoop")
>> I think people fail to realize that this is a complex business case integration
It's both that issue and adopting new "facilities management workflow" like how to monitor, where to invest in monitoring (priority spaces), and policies in place for when detection takes place. NOT JUST A SWITCH IT ON situation. You need competent implementors in the facility management, HR, and health & safety departments of these customers.
As for the legal issue, yes, they have to have an answer to the "what if someone claims we missed a spreader" angle, but from liability point of view, best scenario for workplace integration is did you reasonably try to create a safe space, and when using devices like BioCloud (with all the caveats and potential imperfection that it may bring) is definitely supportive of the case that YES, the business is clearly trying to do everything it can using "best practices" and state of the art technology.
The standard WILL not be PERFECT SAFE SPACE WITH ZERO RISKS - heck, just walking into the office and you can slip on the stairs, get stuck in an elevator, catch someone else's cold and so on etc. - but rather the standard will be "reasonably safe" with "reasonable safe space CV measures" -- e.g. not expecting every business to be able to guarantee "virus free" air - that will never happen and nobody (including the courts) would expect that.
Just like vaccines - not 100 percent effective and no guarantee -- BioCloud if properly implemented, won't also be total guarantee. All these measures will be about probabilities and reasonable investment....