Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd NAK


Primary Symbol: T.NDM

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and development company based in Vancouver. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of mineral properties. The Company’s principal asset, owned through its wholly owned subsidiary, Pebble Limited Partnership, is a 100% interest in a contiguous block of about 1,840 mineral claims in Southwest Alaska... see more

Bullboard (TSX:NDM)

View:
Prev ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... Next
Comment by RealityCheck123on Jan 05, 2024 2:52pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:The current USACE denied mine plan is uneconomic.

You missed the point.  Short, long, whatever, facts are facts.  If you disagree with any facts presented direct your effort at factual rebuttal.   After 20-years and $1 billion spent ...more  
44
Discussion
Comment by RIDER1975on Jan 05, 2024 2:03pm

RE:RE:RE:The current USACE denied mine plan is uneconomic.

I honestly think and you may get it as an advice: you should have a little more distance from your investments. I dont mean to be offensive, but the number of post you have made here shows that this ...more  
61
Discussion
Comment by RealityCheck123on Jan 05, 2024 1:33pm

RE:RE:The current USACE denied mine plan is uneconomic.

Facts are facts. Do what you please.
17
Discussion
Comment by RIDER1975on Jan 05, 2024 12:40pm

RE:The current USACE denied mine plan is uneconomic.

I am getting envious of your persevierance. What a patience, discipline. I tend to think you try yoir best to defende your short. Instead of swing trading you should have been satisfied with your ...more  
53
Discussion
Post by RealityCheck123on Jan 05, 2024 11:54am

The current USACE denied mine plan is uneconomic.

Until a Feasibility Study releases demonstrated proven/probable "ore" reserves based from some mine plan, the rest is conversation. The USACE, EPA, SCOTUS, Alaska and stakeholder ...more  
149
Discussion
Comment by 5Patrick5on Jan 04, 2024 7:02pm

RE:RE:RE:Per SCOTUS Clerk & Recorder

Why so elementary and parochial ? Don't you like electricity ? We'll all die without it.
52
Discussion
Comment by 5Patrick5on Jan 04, 2024 5:58pm

RE:Facts are & will remain valid until demonstrated otherwise:

Not germane to the Alaska filing. Sorry. Try again without political color.
37
Discussion
Post by RealityCheck123on Jan 04, 2024 5:50pm

Facts are & will remain valid until demonstrated otherwise:

20-years.  $1.0 billion spent.  No Feasibility Study.  No reserves.  Incorrect USACE submitted Plan of Operation and resulting EIS per the real mine plan.  Major miners ...more  
106
Discussion
Comment by RealityCheck123on Jan 04, 2024 4:57pm

RE:RE:Per SCOTUS Clerk & Recorder

Why so foolish and angry?  
48
Discussion
Comment by 5Patrick5on Jan 04, 2024 4:06pm

RE:Per SCOTUS Clerk & Recorder

So you just had to prove to yourself what I already told you and act like you found it. Such a child.  BTW, if ever a case rising to SCOTUS fit the doctrine of "Original Jurisdiction" ...more  
71
Discussion
Post by RealityCheck123on Jan 04, 2024 1:46pm

Per SCOTUS Clerk & Recorder

Unless postponed, SCOTUS will conference January 5, 2024 to determine whether to deny or accept Alaska's Bill of Complaint.    A 2024 Case Distribution Schedule has yet to be prepared ...more  
159
Discussion
Comment by 5Patrick5on Jan 04, 2024 12:56pm

RE:RE:RE:Not on Case Distribution Schedule? Page 3, Section 4. 2

Forgive us if Nobody relies on your commentary and prognostications. You are discredited. 
44
Discussion
Comment by RealityCheck123on Jan 04, 2024 12:47pm

RE:RE:Not on Case Distribution Schedule? Page 3, Section 4. 2

Thank you for your constructive input.   IF SCOTUS does determine whether to hear or not on January 5, 2024 then an announcement will be immediately released.
41
Discussion
Prev ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... Next
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
{{currentVideo.headline}}
{{currentVideo.link1Text}}
{{currentVideo.link2Text}}
< Previous
{{moreVideoText}}
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities