Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd NAK


Primary Symbol: T.NDM

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and development company based in Vancouver. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of mineral properties. The Company’s principal asset, owned through its wholly owned subsidiary, Pebble Limited Partnership, is a 100% interest in a contiguous block of about 1,840 mineral claims in Southwest Alaska... see more

TSX:NDM - Post Discussion

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd > Appeal will be Denied
View:
Post by RealityCheck123 on Apr 28, 2023 12:31pm

Appeal will be Denied

Remanded back to District Engineer confirming current Record of Decision stands.  A permit cannot be issued under the current mine plan which was assessed by NEPA EIS for several reasons:
1.  The EIS is incomplete and the uneconmic mine plan requires revision.  Economics and Pebble Tapes
2.  The current mine plan requires resubmittal with a new permit application.
3.  Any revised mine plan is required to avoid EPA restricted filling areas.
4. EPA continues to have 404 oversight and permit application rejection.
5.  Under any scenario a permit cannot be issued.

The remand by the Division Engineer based on a couple ambiguous ROD reasons can be modified or removed while still rejecting the appeal.  Looks like this was the legal plan all along including EPA to veto during the appeal process.  Don't agree with it.

A real mining company proposing only a underground mine on a much smaller production scale, assuming economic, had a chance.
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities