RE:It does make sense...Warlockkk wrote: Why sit around waiting for results, perhaps drilling in unlikely places in the target area out of desperation to keep the drill spinning? Instead move on to the next target, then on to the next, and so on. Once the results start coming in, then choose where to follow up. I like it. I havn't bought back in yet, but it is near the top of the list.
War, NFLD seems to be moving as quickly as they can to drill what I assume they believe is the best prospect on each property given they seem to be working with only one drill. That's not the issue in my view. It's having to read between the lines in trying to determine if they did or did not receive assay results when anticipated (e.g., Schooner by the end of August). Either state that the assay results have been received or they have been delayed....llike I said, my guess is they did receive assay results from Schooner (North) and provided a brief comment on it in the today's press release without mentioning that this was what the assay results produced. Technically this may not violate any rules, but from an investor relations standpoint, it gives the appearance that NFLD is purposly keeping the wording ambiguous because they fear stating this is what the assay results produced might discourage existing or potential shareholders.....