RE:RE:Next update .... you contradict yourself in every sentence…
Quote:
It is a good sign when their communication refers to 'shareholders' as opposed to 'stakeholders'.
Since this CCAA process began,
they have not mentioned 'shareholders' explicitly.
I view this as a positive sign. I don't think there is a need to explain the above...written by desperate stupid investor...
Everything it's a good sign to the losers, since when do you losers even consider any "sign"?
I gave you lots of "signs" over the years:
GB is not smart
GB went bankrupt once with T-REX
GB is paying himself too much
GB is making wrong deals.
and many many many many many many more "SIGNS" did you ever look at any "SIGNS"? how come now everything is a good "SIGN"?
Do you want me to list the "BAD SIGNS"?
Here are some BAD signs:
Since this CCAA process began,
they have not mentioned 'shareholders' explicitly and this is a bad sign even as per your own post...
Delays over delays...
every time NMX delayed something it was a bad sign. Remember the delay in FS? it ended up to be a cancel the FS.
Do you remember the delay in getting financing while having "Multiple excellent offers on GB's desk"? ended up that he didn't have multiple excellent offers and he diluted your A$$ just like I told you so
Do you remember the delay in Pal deal of $0.25 a share? ended up Pal was not interested even after long extensions...
WTF makes you think this delays are "GOOD SIGN"?
This delay means the secured investors are not getting even close to their money back and panic set in...
NOONE will invest into a failed company with stupid deals already signed by a moron with shares issued like crazy and having to still invest another billion to complete a plan that was stupid and flawd to start with...
NMX will be sold to highest bidder and will not include saving stupid people.
Just my 2 cents...
Nothing you can do about it now, just wait and see...but stop the "GOOD SIGN" BS...admit you F.ed up and you should have listened to the SIGNS I gave you over last 3 years.
Got GOLD?
How about SILVER?
Luna2020 wrote: It is a good sign when their communication refers to 'shareholders' as opposed to 'stakeholders'. Since this CCAA process began, they have not mentioned 'shareholders' explicitly. I view this as a positive sign. The negotiations must be to the point that we (shareholders) are included going forward. The question is at what price? Good luck all.