GREY:NMKEF - Post by User
Comment by
dalesio_98on Sep 22, 2020 4:15pm
71 Views
Post# 31598819
RE:RE:Another for RAN lawyer
RE:RE:Another for RAN lawyer mick1888 wrote: Would this constitute a legitimate complaint to the AMF (as nothing else seems to have breached their rules)?
mick1888 wrote: A recent post on Sedar 11 Sept 2020 - re National Instrument 51-102 (Continuous Disclosure Obligation), Part 11.2 Change of Status, a) the reporting issuer becomes a venture issuer. NI 51-102 states ' file a notice promptly after the occurrence'. The occurrence was removal of NMX from the stock exchange date 6 Feb 2020, and consequently 'issuer becomes a venture issuer' What is the interpretation of promptly? From 6 Feb to 11 Sept?
Submit complaint to AMF plaintes@lautorite.qc.ca