Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

Nemaska Lithium Inc is a Canada based lithium company. It is engaged in exploring and evaluating lithium properties and processing of spodumene into lithium compounds in Quebec, Canada. The company supplies lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate to the lithium battery industry used in electric vehicles, cell phones, tablets, and other consumer products.

GREY:NMKEF - Post Discussion

Nemaska Lithium Inc > Latest Monitor Report
View:
Post by mick1888 on Apr 09, 2020 9:03pm

Latest Monitor Report

Encouraging news that 22 interested parties have signed Non Disclosure Agreements (NDA) and a further 4 are in discussions / negotiations. Next important date is 17 April closing date for Letter of Intent (LOI).

It will be interesting how many NDA's progress to LOI. But in any case, it is promising that even although there is a lot of turmoil in the financial markets and the Global Ecomomies, we still have Strategic and Financial partners seriously considering this project.

https://www.pwc.com/ca/en/car/nemaskalithium/assets/nemaskalithium-045_040920.pdf

G
LTA longs (and keep smiling).... ;-)
Comment by Tcheck on Apr 09, 2020 10:39pm
Thanks mick for the pwc monitor report . yes there are some claims to be worked through . fmc livent is back with a 300 M claim . i thought we didn t owe them a penny . orion 100 M  i think we dont have to keep honouring the streaming agreements  General lithium is a chinese company  i didnt know they existed  Johnson matthey battery materials cant expect business as usual ...more  
Comment by Brudom2002 on Apr 10, 2020 1:52pm
Esprons que quelques groupes ont de lintrt a maintenir lactionnariat en place
Comment by mick1888 on Apr 10, 2020 3:53pm
Now that is the 64 million dollar question and the main crux of the matter for current retail Brudom. For me, the main issue for new investors will be labour. They will have to keep the local or expected labour force on side. I do not know if that is Cree workers or Quebecers, but in any case the deposit or the refining plant is useless without them. So how do you keep them on board, not by ...more  
Comment by Takeactionnow on Apr 10, 2020 4:56pm
The local community not only provides mine site labour and supplies, but they have a substantial equity position too. As has been the case with other Quebec mine developments, local involvement and support is a necessity.
Comment by Calgary_AB on Apr 10, 2020 2:42pm
Tcheck, carefull what you wish for... "Dismissal of the whole thing" How do you dismiss the secured creditors but not the not secured? You are not secured... I think the not secured will be dismissed first and then the secured will share whatever is left...probably not enough to pay back the whole thing but a precent that they agree to.... Good luck and be carefull what you wish for...
Comment by TicTacTo on Apr 10, 2020 6:15am
Thanks for update
Comment by Charlene on Apr 10, 2020 8:47am
Thanks, Mick.  Just imagine the interest if we didn't have Covid.  It a critical month coming up.  Good luck all.
Comment by mick1888 on Apr 10, 2020 10:57am
Cheers Charlene. Another good sign is that the deadline for LOI's has not been extended (yet) beyond 17 April which gives the impression SISP is going well.... ;-)
Comment by Tiger737373 on Apr 10, 2020 1:50pm
Thanks, Mick and Takeaction, always interesting to read your post. When we take the time to analyse the last report, it is very nice to see several interested parties. But when we examine certain creditors, they are mainly due on the basis of contractual disputes over the delivery of the lithium products delivered. This does not mean that all of these requests will be considered once the CCAA is ...more  
Comment by Takeactionnow on Apr 10, 2020 2:09pm
Great insight, Tiger. A forward-thinking creditor, while needing to maximize their recovery of any amount owed in a worst-case scenario, wants financing to be achieved and should be prepared to take some risk in helping a restructuring happen. This is why service providers of cash-strapped companies will take shares as compensation. Down the road, more immediate revenues can be realized by getting ...more  
Comment by Calgary_AB on Apr 10, 2020 2:54pm
It's just funny how respectfull the two of you are to eachother, very respectfull PUMPERS. Don't you think you give it away that the two of you is just one preson? Keep crediting eachother... Got GOLD Takeaction? how come you don't post the days gold went up like crazy and how come you don't post that silver and gold is impossible to buy? if you find coins they are crazy spreads.  ...more  
Comment by phantom666 on Apr 12, 2020 4:55pm
What would be better for NMX, a strategic or a financial partner?
Comment by Takeactionnow on Apr 12, 2020 6:11pm
Both. They can benefit from an experienced operator and require capital to complete the project.  Having a business partner will bring additional skills to the table and spread the risk.
Comment by mick1888 on Apr 12, 2020 6:54pm
TaN you give the impression you would be happy with someone like Pallinghurst as a Strategic partner, would you also be looking for an additional Financial institution to join this partnership or would you be comfortable just with the Pallinghurst / Traxys JV? After looking into Pallinghursts takeover of Gemfields and their treatment of the original investors of the latter, this single source of ...more  
Comment by Takeactionnow on Apr 12, 2020 7:23pm
Mick, your concerns are very valid. My preference is for both, since I feel there is value in a multi-pronged approach, and, in any event, the amount of capital required is too great for there to be only one source. For example, having an experienced mine operator, who might acquire half of the mine project as part of the deal, would eliminate the need to focus so much attention on what is really ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities