Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Newstrike Brands Ltd NWKRF

Healthcare Biotechnology Cannabis
"Newstrike Brands Ltd is a licensed producer and cultivator of medical cannabis based in Brantford, Ontario. The company cultivates and sells both forms including dried and fresh marihuana."


OTCPK:NWKRF - Post by User

Newstrike Brands Ltd > Warrants
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(7)
•••
Comment by 321Blastoffon May 11, 2018 11:07pm
127 Views
Post# 28021571

RE:RE:RE:Warrants

RE:RE:RE:Warrants
Here is where it gets interesting. These filings on Sedar are extremely difficult to find and define. It speaks to me as creating an extra obstacle for the investor to have to navigate when there are clearly rules in place regarding continuous disclosure. What is the reason for this obfuscation in this or any case ? How can an investor protect themselves from such opaque procedures ? Should we perhaps look into this more concisely through the lens of the Ontario Securities Commission ?
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities