OTCPK:OEXFF - Post by User
Comment by
JDavis17on Apr 26, 2018 8:48pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
149 Views
Post# 27947828
RE:RE:RE:RE:Dead money
RE:RE:RE:RE:Dead moneyDitto99 wrote: None of what you guys are talkig about matters until they release well results. This is the whole reason for holding this name. IBR is NOT a company without good wells, they're in fact bankrupt which is why mangement got punted, new blood brought in and rebranded the name.
These are literally company making/breaking wells. Anything under 350bbl/d will be a disappointment. 350 - 400 bbl/d is neutral and will be tough to build a thriving company around. 400 - 450 bbl/d is great and proves this is a viable long term comany. 450bbl/d + (like some of the offsetting CIOC and Velvet wells) and look the F out and strap in. Here are some of Velvet's wells that offset them by only a couple of km. This is February public data from accumap:
02/14-10-068-03W6/0 - 509bbl/d oil
00/14-10-068-03W6/0 - 630bbl/d oil
00/12-10-068-03W6/2 - 501bbl/d oil
00/01-10-069-03W6/2 to the north is much further along in it's production life but months 2-4 were also around 500bbl/d.
Like i said, it's no stretch to expect company making wells, 450+ bbl/d. If they pull something out of their hat and show 525bbl/d+ rocket fuel will be engaged.
Great wells results will make IBR's land more valuable to Velvet, but IBR's land remains too scattered to be efficient on its own. I know they can partner up with Velvet to gain those efficiencies, but why pay two managements to do the job one can easily handle? That is a lot of unnecessary and expensive overhead.
So sell the company to Velvet, soon.