Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum North American Palladium Ltd (New) PALDF

North American Palladium Ltd is a precious metal mining company. The company operates the Lac des Iles palladium mine located in Ontario, Canada, which is one of only two primary producers of palladium in the world. The group believes there is exploration upside near this location, and the limited number of primary palladium production areas also offers investors exposure to palladium prices... see more

OTCPK:PALDF - Post Discussion

North American Palladium Ltd (New) > Potential of competing offer
View:
Post by Westcliff47 on Nov 26, 2019 7:37pm

Potential of competing offer

Brookfield have twice indicated they have no real concept of the value of NAP. Once when they sold 5 million shares for $13 and now accepting an offer of $16 for the remaining 48 million shares they still own.
However in order to observe minority shareholder rights they agreed to Implats offer when Implats said they would pay minority shareholders $19.74.
If another company was an interested party in making a competing bid why would they offer Brookfield more than $16 per share? They could go after the minority shareholders through Brookfield and increase the offer to the minority shareholders. Brookfield has to consider it as under minority shareholders rights ( CBCA & OBCA) they would be deemed to contravening the Act if they didn’t.
What that increase might be would be up to the new bidder but it would mean they have a chance of picking up the company for say an extra $20 million more than Implats were prepared to pay.
Now if that new bidder was smart and had been picking up shares cheaper than $19.74 (600,000+ crossed today) then if Implats upped their bid well that would be good for all of us and for whoever bought those 600, 000+ shares today. Also if they were a mining competitor to Implats it might seem to be a way of making them pay more.
I am not a lawyer so there may be holes in this argument but it ups the potential of a competing offer.

AIMHO

Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities