Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals
"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."


GREY:PGDIF - Post by User

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd.
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by Durkastanon Mar 06, 2011 7:31pm
443 Views
Post# 18241533

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Interesting Movement

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Interesting MovementThis was discussed in detail when the decision was announced.

The cost to funding Chidliak to a bankable feasibility study easily would have cost BHP $50mm +. No company throws around that kind of cash on a hope and a prayer. The truth is that there just isn't enough evidence at this time to justify that kind of commitment.

If BHP didn't believe in the potential of Chidliak, then they would have pulled out of the project. There's a big difference between not opting into another expensive 7% and pulling out entirely. Chidliak has BHP's vote of confidence for at least another year.

2008 program: 3 kimberlites discovered
2009 program: 13 kimberlites discovered
2010 program: 34 kimberlites discovered

2011 program: Unknown, but it's hard to argue with that kind of growth profile.

Drills should be turning any day now.

Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities