GREY:PLUUF - Post by User
Comment by
juanPeruon Apr 22, 2019 1:20pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0340-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
185 Views
Post# 29655183
RE:Macusani Yellocake's Appeal for Review (summary & comments)
RE:Macusani Yellocake's Appeal for Review (summary & comments)juanPeru wrote:
The incident can be described and legally reasoned as follows:
(...)
5. (...) If INGEMMET’s servant was still attending then it’s not clear she shouldn’t attend Macusani’s representative, and if there is any doubt of this then the most favorable interpretation (to Macusani’s interests) should be chosen.
Here it should say "5. (...) If INGEMMET’s servant was still attending then it’s not clear
why she shouldn’t attend Macusani’s representative, and if there is any doubt of this then the most favorable interpretation (to Macusani’s interests) should be chosen."