Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd PTQMF

"Petaquilla Minerals Ltd explores for gold in Panama. The Company operates the Molejon gold mine in Panama and owns exploration and development stage projects in Spain and Portugal."


GREY:PTQMF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by wwadehammeron May 11, 2012 8:37pm
207 Views
Post# 19901613

Painful

Painful

It's really sad that board members keep asking PMC why he(she) keeps posting and following the stock.  PMC is repetitive ("anticipating" and "are we haveing fun yet")  but his/her bottom line message is that management has not kept its promises and that's why the SP is in the toliet.   That's PMC message: management sucks.  PMC, why don't you stop with the "are we having fun yet line".  Nobody's having any fun with the SP at 33 cents.   Many on this board think management has done a good job in bring the mine into production.  They do have it in production but everything seems to be brought on-line one to two years after it was projected.   Nobody likes to think that their investment has turned sour and look for scapegoats to blame.  PTQ has turned sour, it's not PMC or my fault.  We want the stock to go up as much or more than you do.  We just want to pressure management to meet reasonable goals.  PDI spin-out was approved THREE years ago and now certain posters are telling us that they will vote no and maybe PDI will never come about.  Who knows, maybe Fifer and the big shareholders will vote no.  What's to stop them?  They announced they had reached 100,000 ounces per year production 18 months ago and actual production is now around 70,000.  Is it wrong to point this out to new members of the board?  You have a right to say management is doing a good job and we have the right to disagree and say things could be a lot better.

Bullboard Posts