Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Pacific Wildcat Resources Corp PWCRF

Pacific Wildcat Resources Corp is engaged in the acquisition and development of mineral properties located in Africa. The company's projects are Marima Hill Project which is a world-class Niobium and Rare Earth Resource located in Kenya, and Muiane Project is located in Mozambique.


GREY:PWCRF - Post by User

Comment by Granddeckon Mar 16, 2015 2:57pm
59 Views
Post# 23526672

RE:TD Got Tired of Waiting

RE:TD Got Tired of WaitingI agee with you on all points in this and your previous post, if you are going to be taken seriously, court is the best way to go. The folloiwing article shows that many were NOT serious and were prospecting rather than legitimate.

Heres hoping this sell off today is either tax loss or gettting triple their money on their 0.005 purchases.

The comanyy felt they have a very solid case so no reason to doubt that PAW wouldnt have been one of the companies that had all of their books in order, as WE ARE THE NORTH!!

https://allafrica.com/stories/201503162164.html


Kenya: Mining Firms Back Out of New Licence Issuance Scrutiny

By Lola Okulo

Half of the 43 mining firms whose licences were revoked last year following a probe into validity of their applications have failed to recover their permits.

A report released on Saturday by the Ministry of Mining, after a year of reviewing new submissions by the firms; states that the 22 did not reapply. The firms were instructed to put in fresh applications after their initial ones were found to be invalid and were given more time to fulfill the set requirements.

"In order to ensure that the process was fair and transparent, all the 43 licence holders/applicants were given an opportunity to demonstrate that the mineral titles issued met the legal and technical requirements, through re-submission of documentation that accompanied their applications," said Cabinet secretary Najib Balala in the mining implementation status report.

Only four companies were found to have met all criteria and their suspensions were promptly lifted.

Three companies were found to have grossly violated the mining laws in acquisition of their licences leading to outright revocation of the permits.

Out of the 43, that of Cortec Mining Kenya Limited is in abeyance pending a court ruling after it sued the government following the suspension in January 2014. The company is eyeing mining operations in Kwale's Mrima Hills.

The re-applications of seven other companies failed to meet the full licence requirements. The companies were however removed from the suspension list on condition that they work towards meeting all requirements. So far only one has managed to meet requirements over the last one year and has been cleared while the rest had their re-applications rejected.

According to the Mining Ministry, after preliminary reviews of the suspensions, a total of 32 firms were given a chance to make fresh applications after their previous licences were found to be invalid.

Out of the 32, two withdrew their applications completely, six re-applied and their applications were subsequently approved, two firms asked for more time to meet the requirements and their requests have been granted while 22 did not respond at all.

The various mining licences were reviewed after Balala ordered a probe in September 2013 on all licences issued between January to May 2013 - which was a government transition period - out of concern that most applications were rushed through at a time when a new government was being ushered in.

The report by the taskforce investigating the applications reported in January last year that majority of the licences were irregularly issued, some without proper documents while others went to to speculators who had no intention of prospecting for any minerals but hoped to later sell the rights to the highest bidder.



Bullboard Posts