GREY:RGVNF - Post by User
Post by
curtisprodon Apr 01, 2010 10:21am
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
211 Views
Post# 16948406
Red. We agree
Red. We agreeYou agree with what I have been saying all along, "post at will on this colossal waste of time we call the REV BB, "
And yet there is an oxymoron in your post. You insinuate that I have pumped this stock up to $1.00 and yet this BB is a colossal waste of time.....
Your claim we climbed to $1 because of Red Mt.
I believe it rose because of this PR:s....Regent has been advised by the vendor that on Jan. 13, 2006, he has entered into an agreement with AAA Capital Energy AG, a German energy fund, to sell a 55-per-cent interest in McCallan to AAA in return for AAA committing to provide in the order of $100-million in capital contribution to McCallan over two years to finance the exploration and development of the concessions. Under the terms of the Jan. 13, 2006, agreement, McCallan is to receive a total of $23-million (U.S.) on or before April 30, 2006, with the balance to be received in several tranches on or before Dec. 31, 2007.
Red Mt. had been around for over 20 years. I believe that this $100 million deal was the reason REV went to $1. Nothing I said or anything the Texas report said had anything to do with this rise in SP.
When the financing collapsed, so did the SP.
By the way Red...Why won't you tell us the year of the original Texas Report?