Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Regent Ventures Ltd RGVNF

Regent Ventures Ltd is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral resources properties.


GREY:RGVNF - Post by User

Post by curtisprodon Sep 10, 2010 9:51am
228 Views
Post# 17433342

Stocktalk Question

Stocktalk QuestionAs our resident expert  would please give us your take on the PR:


Regent Ventures Ltd.'s second well, the Francis Thompson No. 2...reached the desired total depth of 4,063 feet on Aug. 31, 2010.   ANY SIGNIFICANCE TO THE DEPTH?

The wellbore was then conditioned and prepared for logging on the same day. Baker Atlas, a division of Baker Hughes, was contracted and performed a suite of logs that included high-definition induction, compensated Z-Densilog, compensated neutron, gamma ray and a TTRM submini-log.   WOULD THESE TESTS BE CONDUCTED IF THIS WAS A DEAD HOLE?

 No. 2 well encountered a well-developed shallow sand, believed to be the Harold sand formation, the Tuscaloosa No. 1 sand formation, the Tuscaloosa No. 2 sand formation and the Barrier sand formation.
EXPLAIN THESE

With these discoveries, five-eighths-inch production casing was set and cemented to a depth of 4,060 feet on Sept. 1, 2010.   WOULD THEY DO THIS UNLESS THEY WERE FAIRLY CERTAIN THIS COULD BE A PRODUCTION WELL?

Thank thee

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>