Regent Ventures Ltd RGVNF

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: ponder more

[curtisprod]

Ken, I have a large position in REV and have stated this.  That is my prejudice.  But my ethics will not allow me to falsify information to enhance my position.

You have stated you want REV to drop to .06, therefore you are equally as biased.  Your ethics, I don't know?

"close to the company"  means I call and get through and talk and question.  I am not associated with, paid by, compensated by or have any legal or illegal connection with REV outside of being a shareholder.  I ask questions and post the truth, the facts and if it is my opinion or a rumor, I say it is.   I do not disguise my bias.

I accept your apology for mistaking my comments that I am "connected" to the company.  As stated above, I AM NOT.   I am trusted by whomever I talk to there.  I am trusted because I do not falsify the information and I ask  them directly about negative comments and charges made against them and I ask them to clarify them.  I challenge them and ask them hard questions.  They obviously respect that.    

You seem to feel the Texas report is worthless.   Ask RedO/Dogone about the Texas Report.  They are the biggest proponents of it. 

Again, there have been no complete testing done in Louisiana so your premise that it is next to worthless is without
foundation.

My posts have no effect on the price.  I made several strong posts recently.  During that period the SP fell 33%.  So much for anything I say.  It means nothing.   You buy and sell and it benefits you when it drops.  I am not a trader.
I am waiting for .60.   You are waiting for .06. 

We ;can go back and forth forever.  But you have made your points and I hope I have made mine.  Fine'