Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF



GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Comment by ProfBaIthazaron May 23, 2019 10:16pm
64 Views
Post# 29769915

RE:RE:Good thread about a statement made by Mark Selby on CRUX

RE:RE:Good thread about a statement made by Mark Selby on CRUX
User image

To all users of stockhouse who read this channel - Always thread careful on Mickey462 information. The guy has openly stated numerous times he is begging for a job at RNX. He so desperately wants to work and be part of their promotion team, so anything he says will be bias. His agenda by his own mouth he wants a job at RNX. Might explain his around the clock pumping. LOL

riverrrow wrote: User imageIf RNX receives a firm offer of $2 a share either as cash or in shares of the buyer I would think $2 would be considered irresistible. In the long term RNX might prove to be much more valuable but how many long term investors are holding RNX. GLTA.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>