Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Second Wave Petroleum Inc SCSZF



GREY:SCSZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by vandenpon Apr 20, 2006 9:22pm
69 Views
Post# 10716891

RE: Poor little rat - see #10 for reply

RE: Poor little rat - see #10 for reply1) The idiots question: "is your little parable of the rats trying to suggest I don't invest in other stocks?" My answer: Actually my parable suggests you are an idiot that is not capable of focusing on what actually matters, PROVEN by your massive losses in SCS and PROVEN by years of posts filled with data that was PROVEN to be MEANINGLESS The idiots statement: "You cannot proove all of your arguments by finding some truth n one small part of it." My reply: You believe this is a SMALL part of it. "Terrible financials + terrible track record = terrible investment" It is a MASSIVE part of it which makes every other part meaningless. This is precisely why you have lost thousands upon thousands of dollars more then any of us, yet you claim to have a brain. 2) The idiots statement: "You started this whole thing arguing that analysing, studying and understanding a compnay was a waste of time." My reply: I stated FIRST analyze, study and understand a companies FINANCIALS and TRACK RECORD. If these two are crap, then you’re an idiot to INVEST in this company. This is where you and I differ. If these two are crap, you still believe in investing in the company. 3) The idiots statement: "You keep going on about being a trader not an invester. A trader buys and sells on behalf of a 3rd party, and earns income for this service. I used to write NPV, Interest Mismatch, currency exposure reports etc for a trading desk" My reply: I'll PROVE you wrong AGAIN. https://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=trader trader A person who buys and sells securities with the goal of profiting from short-term price swings. Continue lying and making yourself look like an idiot. 4) The idiots statement: “At which point you sold SOME of your shares, not all. The rest you kept, but apparently not as an investment. By your own definition, you were still an idiot even after you had your revelation. My reply: More lying eh idiot? I sold the VAST MAJORITY of my shares. The only reason I kept the other shares is because it would have cost me a large percentage in fees to sell out of a different account. I also like to throw a little money at a long shot once and a while. I guess I will now need to clarify something that I didn’t realize even you were too stupid to understand. To buy and hold THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of dollars in a company with "Terrible financials + terrible track record = terrible investment", like you do, makes you an idiot. To have a few hundred dollars in that same company, like many others have done, is a little foolish. You, of course are too stupid to understand this and will attempt to twist this truth into being wrong, but we’re getting used to how the poor little rat works. 5) The idiots statement: “You gave the definiton of a "Day Trader".” My reply: More lying eh idiot? Go to the link. Is there day in there anywhere? https://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=trader I notice you argue like you invest. You grasp at anything meaningless and ignore the real truth. Poor little rat. 6) The idiots statement: “You want some excuse for call everyonme else an idiot for losing money with SCS, but at the same time absolve yourself for the same mistakes. The morer desperate you try, the morew stupid and desperate you look.” My reply: More lies eh drunken idiot? Do you even know what you’re typing? Ever heard of PROOF reading? I didn’t make the SAME mistakes you made at all liar. I sold the VAST MAJORITY of my shares above 60 cents. Poor little rat, we all know you held your shares to well below 10 cents because you always focus on meaningless data. Continue with your lies poor little rat. 7) The idiots statement: “ "Terrible financials + terrible track record = terrible investment" Ask Spinner. Napier V.NIR fits the left hand side of this equation. Spinner bought in at 4c months ago when they came out of restructuring, has held, and it is currently trading at 10c and above. Would you like to tell him that was a terrible investment? “ My reply: OOOOOOOOWEEEEE are you stupid, but at least you seem to be sobering up a little!! I’ll bet you anything Spinner and anyone with half a brain would say that V.NIR would be a terrible INVESTMENT if it fit these criteria. The problem is you are too stupid to understand that he is most likely not INVESTING in V.NIR. He is most likely TRADING it you idiot. The other difference, which you are too stupid to realize, is that he would NEVER invest THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of dollars in a company with "Terrible financials and a terrible track record”. This is what you do. If he did I would say he would be an idiot like you. Continue with your lies poor little rat. 8) The idiots statement: “ “Trading = Investing V.nir Does fit your formula and SPinner is investing in it and making several hundred percent when your formula says don't invest. Proof by contradiction your formula is wrong. “ My reply: More lies eh idiot? This is not my formula. Show the post where I stated this liar. By the way. this comparison just shows how stupid you are. You compare a short term purchase in a very questionable company to make a quick buck with, at most, a few thousand dollars to your LONG TERM INVESTMENT in a very questionable company with THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of dollars and you ride it down to nothing. Typical comparison from the poor little rat. 9) The idiots statement: “We have already seen your formula is nonsense.” My reply: There we have it people. The idiot believes "Terrible financials + terrible track record = terrible investment" is nonsense. Poor little rat. 10) The idiot states: “1) "Terrible financials + terrible track record = terrible investment" (Actaully nonsense, many stocks fitting this formula trend up several hundred percent for months makeing them very good investments, see V.NIR for proof by contradicton)“ My reply: Do you realize how stupid you actually sound? For every V.NIR out there, there are 99 V.SCS’s. You are the biggest idiot I’ve ever read, bar none. Can you please remind everyone here how many THOUSANDS you lost in SCS because you believe that a very high percentage of stocks out there fit your formula for investing "Terrible financials + terrible track record = very good investment". Poor little rat.
Bullboard Posts